=== matttbe7 is now known as matttbe === tomreyn_ is now known as tomreyn [16:36] @pilot in === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: ahasenack [19:00] juliank: hi, maybe this fell through over the break, are you ok with this change? Caught it in patch pilot: https://code.launchpad.net/~nteodosio/aptdaemon/+git/aptdaemon/+merge/478653 [19:07] ahasenack: You're doing too well of a job in patch pilot? :D [19:07] delegating! [19:07] (and you were named specifically) [19:08] I had organistional questions I did not ask [19:08] But we'll sort this out Monday [19:08] ok [20:09] (FTR, sponsorship queue is back. I'm curious about how I screwed up the timedelta formatting. :P) [20:18] @pilot out === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: N/A [20:28] Who has access to the KPI instance Canonical-side? https://ubuntu-release.kpi.ubuntu.com/d/yIC34LpGk/ubuntu-metrics [20:28] Whoever does, they also may consider adding the average age to graphs. I have a local run going now which I'm using to verify the fix. [20:28] (for the sponsorship queue) [20:29] @pilot in === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: tsimonq2 [20:29] sudip, liushuyu: I recall you two recently getting (more) upload permissions, you should patch pilot ;) [20:30] tsimonq2: I can only do universe packages [20:31] * sudip did 2 syncs from the sponsorship queue today [20:31] did not do the pilot thing though :) [20:31] liushuyu: Still lots of candidates ;) [20:31] sudip: \o/ don't be afraid to @pilot in [20:46] adrien: Thanks for the gnupg2 MP update; call me old school but I still like sponsoring debdiffs. :P [20:46] * tsimonq2 ducks from schopin [20:56] shunnnn [20:58] :D [21:02] I'll leave bug 2093164 for someone more familiar with netplan, although the patches seem sane on first glance/skim. Part of me thinks this might be mkukri or juliank (or similar) territory. [21:02] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2093164 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Plucky) "initramfs-tools generates deprecated netplan config gateway4 and gateway6" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2093164 [21:16] tsimonq2: initrds are bdrung's fun zone [21:16] ok thanks TIL :) [21:23] Does someone happen to know the rationale behind occasional uploads to OpenStack archives (and only those archives) showing up in the sponsorship queue? [21:23] Do they have their own review process or do they use the sponsorship queue as well? [21:35] Can someone take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgit2/+bug/2093205/comments/3? [21:35] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2093205 in rustc-1.83 (Ubuntu) "libgit2: libgit2 1.9 update and migration" [Undecided, New] [21:35] rustc-1.83 is a package in main component [21:50] liushuyu: looking [21:51] so, previously someone else had issues with the debdiff having a large patch that patches in a newer version of libgit2 Rusy bindings, this is something we can't trim down [21:52] I'm not worried about it. We've been working fairly closely on this. [21:52] That being said, it'd help if I could grab a dsc file from a PPA [21:53] tsimonq2: I have https://launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/+archive/ubuntu/rust-updates-1.83/+sourcepub/16853951/+listing-archive-extra [21:53] Although the version number is not the same [21:54] (Rust toolchain is very sensitive to the "~" symbol, so I just use this alternative way to make the ppa version sorts lower) [21:56] "Version numbers are cheap." :) [21:57] (If there continues to be a diff I'll just add a patch; better than an entirely new orig IMO) [21:57] Oh, it actually liked your PPA build better. Let's see if Soyuz likes it too. [21:59] liushuyu: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc-1.83/1.83.0+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu2 [21:59] better than an entirely new orig IMO > Yes, that will be much of a pain [21:59] tsimonq2: Thanks! [21:59] Thank *you*! :) [22:00] rbasak: Have you finished testing yet? :P https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/hello/+git/hello/+merge/471069 [22:00] I do note that there is a loophole in the original tarball processing in regard to multi-source-tarball uploads though. If a source package previously does not have a component source tarball, you can upload an additional tarball without changing the version number [22:02] That's very true. I've found the same to be the case with .orig.tar vs the asc files for the orig. [22:02] RikMills: I don't think KA uploads .asc files :P [22:17] @pilot out === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: N/A [22:18] Down to 29. [22:18] (Lowest since October 11th.)