| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: epiphany-browser (noble-proposed/universe) [46.0-2build1 => 46.5-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra) | 01:03 | |
| === ubuntu_4321 is now known as ubuntu4321 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (jammy-backports/universe) [1.27.5-1~bpo22.04.1 => 1.28.5-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset) | 07:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (noble-backports/universe) [1.27.5-1~bpo24.04.1 => 1.28.5-1~bpo24.04.1] (no packageset) | 07:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.13.8-1~ubuntu22.04.0 => 2.13.11-1ubuntu1~22.04.1] (kernel-dkms) | 08:05 | |
| bluesabre | Poking again about xfce4-panel 4.18.4-1ubuntu0.1 ... can this be released to -proposed so we can continue the SRU process before 24.04.2? I saw Skia tagged it yesterday, but I haven't heard anything else. | 10:26 |
|---|---|---|
| Skia | vanguard today is ahasenack, but he isn't yet connected to IRC, so maybe try pinging him on Matrix? | 10:28 |
| bluesabre | Can do. Thanks! | 10:29 |
| tjaalton | not online yet, maybe in 3h | 10:39 |
| RikMills | ubuntu-release: is the kubuntu noble ISO still being built with proposed enabled? | 11:53 |
| Skia | andersson123: ^^^ | 11:53 |
| RikMills | I have a potential SRU that would be much easier to verify if they are | 11:55 |
| Skia | RikMills: I didn't touch that recently, but from what I'm aware, -proposed is generally not enabled, but I think I recall there were exceptions for some flavors, and I don't know the state of kubuntu | 11:56 |
| RikMills | Yeah, that is why I ask | 11:57 |
| andersson123 | RikMills: I'll double check for you now | 11:57 |
| andersson123 | 2 mins | 11:57 |
| RikMills | np. thanks! | 11:57 |
| andersson123 | `etc/crontab:21 8 * * *DIST=noble PROPOSED=1 for-project kubuntu cron.daily-live --live ` | 11:58 |
| andersson123 | proposed **IS** enabled for kubuntu noble :) | 11:58 |
| RikMills | lovely. thanks you :) | 11:58 |
| RikMills | *thank | 11:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (noble-proposed/main) [1.539.1 => 1.539.2] (core) | 12:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-meta (noble-proposed/universe) [1.451.1 => 1.451.2] (kubuntu) | 12:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-settings (noble-proposed/universe) [1:24.04.12 => 1:24.04.13] (kubuntu) | 12:15 | |
| RikMills | ubuntu-sru: please accept packages into noble-proposed for LP: #2096990 | 12:18 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2096990 in kubuntu-settings (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] Noble - calamares minimal install removes kubuntu-desktop metapackage and kubuntu-settings-desktop" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2096990 | 12:18 | |
| RikMills | need to have that on the 24.04.2 ISO | 12:18 |
| ahasenack | ack | 12:42 |
| utkarsh2102 | andersson123: hey, you're checking the actually deployed cronjob, right? | 13:11 |
| utkarsh2102 | not just the one in cdimage source :) | 13:11 |
| RikMills | utkarsh2102: looking on the noble daily cd manifest, it seems it is not picking up packages from proposed | 13:29 |
| RikMills | if it did it would have some plasma 5.27.12 packages. it does not | 13:30 |
| RikMills | :/ | 13:31 |
| RikMills | andersson123: ^^ | 13:32 |
| utkarsh2102 | i'll have it checked on the server | 13:41 |
| RikMills | ty :) | 13:42 |
| ahasenack | RikMills: I'm looking at the kubuntu sru now | 13:45 |
| ahasenack | I thought seeds would be involved, since it's a "task" like package, but looks like I'm wrong | 13:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | 21 8 * * * DIST=noble PROPOSED=1 for-project kubuntu cron.daily-live --live | 13:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | RikMills: apparently the deployed cronjob also had proposed enabled. | 13:46 |
| utkarsh2102 | i can trigger a new build for kubuntu for you if you'd like. | 13:46 |
| RikMills | utkarsh2102: I wonder why not getting packages from proposed in the manifest then? | 13:47 |
| RikMills | utkarsh2102: yeah, can try | 13:47 |
| utkarsh2102 | the build happened at 08:21 AM UTC | 13:47 |
| utkarsh2102 | were things published and at the right place by then? | 13:47 |
| RikMills | utkarsh2102: should have been pucbished in noble-proposed for over 24hrs | 13:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | hm, no idea honestly | 13:52 |
| utkarsh2102 | i can re-build again? :) | 13:52 |
| RikMills | utkarsh2102: you can try, but I suspect the result will be the same | 13:53 |
| utkarsh2102 | hm, okay | 13:54 |
| RikMills | will do no harm | 13:54 |
| RikMills | and I would like to be wrong | 13:54 |
| utkarsh2102 | hehe | 13:55 |
| utkarsh2102 | i'd like to retry the build from | 13:55 |
| utkarsh2102 | https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/450/builds | 13:55 |
| utkarsh2102 | instead of directly running at the server and messing something up, hah | 13:55 |
| utkarsh2102 | RikMills: are you okay to request a rebuild yourself from there? | 13:55 |
| RikMills | let me see | 13:55 |
| ahasenack | RikMills: do you need to commit your kubuntu-settings change here as well? https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kubuntu-settings | 13:56 |
| ahasenack | your "upstream" | 13:56 |
| RikMills | utkarsh2102: it says (rebuilding) | 13:56 |
| RikMills | ahasenack: usually when I know it is accepted into the archive (in this case proposed) | 13:57 |
| ahasenack | RikMills: ok, cool | 13:57 |
| RikMills | it is ready to push | 13:57 |
| ahasenack | RikMills: is this change correct? THat's the verison in plucky: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Dnd5GQBdBN/ | 13:59 |
| ahasenack | that's in kubuntu-meta | 13:59 |
| RikMills | ahasenack: yes, I did that in a pucky container. usually do that so have the latest germinate etc. some older versions don't handle things like alternate | depends | 14:00 |
| RikMills | *plucky | 14:01 |
| ahasenack | ok | 14:01 |
| utkarsh2102 | RikMills: cool beans, let me know how that build goes | 14:01 |
| RikMills | utkarsh2102: will do. thanks | 14:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-settings [source] (noble-proposed) [1:24.04.13] | 14:02 | |
| ahasenack | RikMills: there is a kubuntu-meta in noble-proposed already: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/2065465 | 14:02 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2065465 in kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] broken sub-menus on some 'systray' indicators" [High, Fix Committed] | 14:02 | |
| ahasenack | last comment is actually mine, from october last year | 14:03 |
| RikMills | sigh..... why are these things not getting verified? | 14:04 |
| RikMills | sgmoore: ^^^ | 14:05 |
| RikMills | that was yours? | 14:05 |
| andersson123 | utkarsh2102: I was just checking the source code. I was under the impression we had gitops with cdimage and any cowboys were minimal, and what's running in prod is near enough what's in master. Is this not the case? | 14:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (oracular-proposed/main) [2.66.1+24.10 => 2.67.1+24.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 14:26 | |
| RikMills | utkarsh2102: still not pulling packages from proposed by the looks of it | 14:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (noble-proposed/main) [2.66.1+24.04 => 2.67.1+24.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 14:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (focal-proposed/main) [2.66.1+20.04 => 2.67.1+20.04] (core) | 14:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (jammy-proposed/main) [2.66.1+22.04 => 2.67.1+22.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 14:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (noble-proposed) [4.8.2-0ubuntu0~24.04.1] | 14:33 | |
| RikMills | andersson123: kubuntu noble livefs is not installing packages from proposed | 14:56 |
| pushkarnk | Can someone restart this build https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rack-parser/0.7.0-3/+build/30147423 please? There's no build log attached. | 15:27 |
| cjwatson | pushkarnk: done | 15:28 |
| pushkarnk | thanks cjwatson! | 15:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [amd64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) | 16:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [i386] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) | 16:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) | 16:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [arm64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) | 16:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [s390x] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) | 16:23 | |
| utkarsh2102 | andersson123 | 16:32 |
| utkarsh2102 | ugh | 16:32 |
| utkarsh2102 | andersson123: it's a bit too different than i'd like | 16:32 |
| utkarsh2102 | i can paste the actual cron deployed on the server :) | 16:32 |
| utkarsh2102 | RikMills: hm, someone needs to investigate | 16:32 |
| andersson123 | utkarsh2102: perhaps in our 24.04.2 retrospective we can look at the relevant diffs on cdimage master and see what we can do to minimise these cowboys? | 16:35 |
| utkarsh2102 | maybe it doesn't have to be retro | 16:35 |
| utkarsh2102 | someone should just do it | 16:35 |
| utkarsh2102 | mwhudson: what d'you think? | 16:36 |
| utkarsh2102 | is it okay to bring back the two files in sync? | 16:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-amd64 [source] (noble-proposed) [27.2] | 16:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-arm64 [source] (noble-proposed) [23.2] | 16:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-riscv64 [source] (noble-proposed) [12.1] | 16:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-ppc64el [source] (noble-proposed) [17.2] | 16:43 | |
| ahasenack | mkukri: see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-amd64/+bug/2096766/comments/5 please | 16:47 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2096766 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu Noble) "Update cd-boot-images-* for Noble 24.04.2" [Critical, New] | 16:47 | |
| mkukri | hmm that looks like the one, but i didnt generate the changes file so im not sure | 16:49 |
| ahasenack | the diff is https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/k7vhPJwxFs/ | 16:50 |
| ahasenack | is that fixing both bugs? | 16:51 |
| ahasenack | mkukri: ^ | 16:52 |
| mkukri | no oops 2062166 was an old bug that updated u-boot to the previous version | 16:52 |
| mkukri | for the current u-boot update there was no bug | 16:52 |
| mkukri | the changelog should say2096766, this is a typo and my bad | 16:52 |
| ahasenack | so where are we? I'm confused. What is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-riscv64/12.1 fixing? | 16:55 |
| mkukri | it is updating both grub and u-boot to the one in the updates pocket | 16:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [riscv64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) | 16:55 | |
| mkukri | ive updated 2096766 to say both grub and u-boot | 16:56 |
| mkukri | and ill try to get the riscv cdboot images reuploaded with the correct changelog | 16:56 |
| mkukri | so i guess can the current 12.1 be rejected? and then i can get it reuploaded with the correct changelog | 17:01 |
| ahasenack | it's accepted :/ | 17:02 |
| ahasenack | is the change in 12.1 correct? Minus the changelog? | 17:03 |
| mkukri | yes | 17:04 |
| mkukri | its just had the wrong line copy pasted, ive updated the package versions just the bug number got missed | 17:04 |
| mkukri | maybe its not a huge deal just confusing | 17:04 |
| utkarsh2102 | ok, no need to re-upload then? | 17:04 |
| ahasenack | hm | 17:13 |
| ahasenack | 12.1 is burned, we could go for 12.2 with the correct changelog, and explain that the previous changelog entry was fixing the wrong bug | 17:13 |
| ahasenack | I don't think we can/should just remove the package from proposed and pretend it never existed | 17:14 |
| ahasenack | although, it's probably not even published yet | 17:14 |
| ahasenack | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-riscv64/12.1 | 17:14 |
| ahasenack | status: accepted | 17:14 |
| ahasenack | mkukri: what's the correct d/changelog? | 17:15 |
| mkukri | it's the same except the bug number should be the same one as the other arches | 17:15 |
| mkukri | s/2062166/2096766/ | 17:15 |
| ahasenack | mkukri: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-riscv64/+bug/2062166 is "Rebuild against u-boot-sifive 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5" | 17:21 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2062166 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu Noble) "Rebuild against u-boot-sifive 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5" [Undecided, Fix Committed] | 17:21 | |
| mkukri | yes and this is 5.1 | 17:21 |
| ahasenack | and we now are rebuilding it against 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5.1 | 17:21 |
| ahasenack | so is 2062166 being fixed anyway? | 17:21 |
| mkukri | it was already fixed i think? | 17:22 |
| mkukri | idk why its not set to fix released | 17:22 |
| mkukri | 5 was already in noble-updates | 17:22 |
| mkukri | or i mean noble release | 17:22 |
| ahasenack | yeah, comment #5 | 17:22 |
| ahasenack | but the task was still "new" | 17:23 |
| ahasenack | looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-riscv64/+bug/2062166/+activity | 17:23 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2062166 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu Noble) "Rebuild against u-boot-sifive 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5" [Undecided, Fix Committed] | 17:23 | |
| === fuseteam1 is now known as fuseteam | ||
| ahasenack | weird | 17:24 |
| ahasenack | so it's fine I think | 17:24 |
| ahasenack | let me just run the sru machinery on the real bug, so we get the verification tags, sru accept comment, etc | 17:24 |
| ahasenack | mkukri: ok, let's leave it as is. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-amd64/+bug/2096766 has the proper tags now for the risc/noble task. We will just have to close it manually upon release into updates. | 17:28 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2096766 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu Noble) "Update cd-boot-images-* for Noble 24.04.2" [Critical, Fix Committed] | 17:28 | |
| ahasenack | I added a comment to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-riscv64/+bug/2062166 hopefully explaining it | 17:28 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2062166 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu Noble) "Rebuild against u-boot-sifive 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5" [Undecided, Fix Committed] | 17:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1] | 17:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [i386] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1] | 17:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1] | 17:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1] | 17:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1] | 17:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1] | 17:31 | |
| ahasenack | release team: I added https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/2096974 to the 24.04.2 milestone, but the regression is still being investigated (in the sense of whether we should revert, or apply a fix on top) | 17:40 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2096974 in tzdata (Ubuntu) "tzdata-2024b-0ubuntu0.24.04 makes std::chrono unusable" [High, Triaged] | 17:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (oracular-proposed) [3.107ubuntu13~24.10.2] | 17:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (noble-proposed) [3.107ubuntu13~24.04.2] | 17:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfce4-panel [source] (noble-proposed) [4.18.4-1ubuntu0.1] | 18:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (jammy-proposed) [4.8.2-0ubuntu0~22.04.1] | 18:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (focal-proposed) [4.8.2-0ubuntu0~20.04.1] | 18:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (jammy-proposed) [3:25.2.1-0ubuntu2.8] | 18:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: osinfo-db (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.20240701-1ubuntu1 => 0.20250124-0ubuntu0.24.10.1] (no packageset) | 19:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-distro-release-notifier (oracular-proposed/universe) [20220915-0ubuntu8 => 20220915-0ubuntu8.24.10.1] (no packageset) | 20:43 | |
| arraybolt3 | ubuntu-release: ^ Fixes the release upgrade notifier for Kubuntu Oracular, right now it's totally and completely broken, this makes it work again. | 20:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: osinfo-db (noble-proposed/universe) [0.20240523-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 => 0.20250124-0ubuntu0.24.04.1] (no packageset) | 20:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: osinfo-db (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.20240523-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 0.20250124-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (oracular-proposed/main) [2024b-1ubuntu2.1 => 2024b-1ubuntu2.2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (noble-proposed/main) [2024b-0ubuntu0.24.04 => 2024b-0ubuntu0.24.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:38 | |
| arraybolt3 | ubuntu-sru: ^ (sorry, mis-pinged the wrnog team) | 21:38 |
| arraybolt3 | (re plasma-distro-release-notifier) | 21:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (oracular-proposed) [2024b-1ubuntu2.2] | 21:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (noble-proposed) [2024b-0ubuntu0.24.04.1] | 21:53 | |
| mwhudson | utkarsh2102: are we talking about the crontab here? yes i don't see why they need to be so different | 22:11 |
| mwhudson | (also not here today) | 22:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlomiri-appmenutheme [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.66-1] (no packageset) | 23:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-jpeg-encoder [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-cellular [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: supernovas [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-phone [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-regex [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: psi-plus [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.4.1456-2.1] (no packageset) | 23:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: supernovas [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-phone [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-jpeg-encoder [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: supernovas [armhf] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlomiri-appmenutheme [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.66-1] (no packageset) | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: supernovas [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-cellular [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlomiri-appmenutheme [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.66-1] (no packageset) | 23:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-jpeg-encoder [armhf] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlomiri-appmenutheme [armhf] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.66-1] (no packageset) | 23:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-regex [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-phone [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-jpeg-encoder [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-cellular [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: psi-plus [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.4.1456-2.1] (no packageset) | 23:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-regex [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1.0.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:57 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!