[01:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: epiphany-browser (noble-proposed/universe) [46.0-2build1 => 46.5-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra)
=== ubuntu_4321 is now known as ubuntu4321
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (jammy-backports/universe) [1.27.5-1~bpo22.04.1 => 1.28.5-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (noble-backports/universe) [1.27.5-1~bpo24.04.1 => 1.28.5-1~bpo24.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.13.8-1~ubuntu22.04.0 => 2.13.11-1ubuntu1~22.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[10:26] <bluesabre> Poking again about xfce4-panel 4.18.4-1ubuntu0.1 ... can this be released to -proposed so we can continue the SRU process before 24.04.2? I saw Skia tagged it yesterday, but I haven't heard anything else.
[10:28] <Skia> vanguard today is ahasenack, but he isn't yet connected to IRC, so maybe try pinging him on Matrix?
[10:29] <bluesabre> Can do. Thanks!
[10:39] <tjaalton> not online yet, maybe in 3h
[11:53] <RikMills> ubuntu-release: is the kubuntu noble ISO still being built with proposed enabled?
[11:53] <Skia> andersson123: ^^^
[11:55] <RikMills> I have a potential SRU that would be much easier to verify if they are
[11:56] <Skia> RikMills: I didn't touch that recently, but from what I'm aware, -proposed is generally not enabled, but I think I recall there were exceptions for some flavors, and I don't know the state of kubuntu
[11:57] <RikMills> Yeah, that is why I ask
[11:57] <andersson123> RikMills: I'll double check for you now
[11:57] <andersson123> 2 mins
[11:57] <RikMills> np. thanks!
[11:58] <andersson123> `etc/crontab:21 8 * * *	DIST=noble PROPOSED=1 for-project kubuntu cron.daily-live --live `
[11:58] <andersson123> proposed **IS** enabled for kubuntu noble :)
[11:58] <RikMills> lovely. thanks you :)
[11:59] <RikMills> *thank
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (noble-proposed/main) [1.539.1 => 1.539.2] (core)
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-meta (noble-proposed/universe) [1.451.1 => 1.451.2] (kubuntu)
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-settings (noble-proposed/universe) [1:24.04.12 => 1:24.04.13] (kubuntu)
[12:18] <RikMills> ubuntu-sru: please accept packages into noble-proposed for LP: #2096990
[12:18] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2096990 in kubuntu-settings (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] Noble - calamares minimal install removes kubuntu-desktop metapackage and kubuntu-settings-desktop" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2096990
[12:18] <RikMills> need to have that on the 24.04.2 ISO
[12:42] <ahasenack> ack
[13:11] <utkarsh2102> andersson123: hey, you're checking the actually deployed cronjob, right?
[13:11] <utkarsh2102> not just the one in cdimage source :)
[13:29] <RikMills> utkarsh2102: looking on the noble daily cd manifest, it seems it is not picking up packages from proposed
[13:30] <RikMills> if it did it would have some plasma 5.27.12 packages. it does not
[13:31] <RikMills> :/
[13:32] <RikMills> andersson123: ^^
[13:41] <utkarsh2102> i'll have it checked on the server
[13:42] <RikMills> ty :)
[13:45] <ahasenack> RikMills: I'm looking at the kubuntu sru now
[13:45] <ahasenack> I thought seeds would be involved, since it's a "task" like package, but looks like I'm wrong
[13:45] <utkarsh2102> 21 8 * * *      DIST=noble PROPOSED=1 for-project kubuntu cron.daily-live --live
[13:46] <utkarsh2102> RikMills: apparently the deployed cronjob also had proposed enabled.
[13:46] <utkarsh2102> i can trigger a new build for kubuntu for you if you'd like.
[13:47] <RikMills> utkarsh2102: I wonder why not getting packages from proposed in the manifest then?
[13:47] <RikMills> utkarsh2102: yeah, can try
[13:47] <utkarsh2102> the build happened at 08:21 AM UTC
[13:47] <utkarsh2102> were things published and at the right place by then?
[13:48] <RikMills> utkarsh2102: should have been pucbished in noble-proposed for over 24hrs
[13:52] <utkarsh2102> hm, no idea honestly
[13:52] <utkarsh2102> i can re-build again? :)
[13:53] <RikMills> utkarsh2102: you can try, but I suspect the result will be the same
[13:54] <utkarsh2102> hm, okay
[13:54] <RikMills> will do no harm
[13:54] <RikMills> and I would like to be wrong
[13:55] <utkarsh2102> hehe
[13:55] <utkarsh2102> i'd like to retry the build from
[13:55] <utkarsh2102> https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/450/builds
[13:55] <utkarsh2102> instead of directly running at the server and messing something up, hah
[13:55] <utkarsh2102> RikMills: are you okay to request a rebuild yourself from there?
[13:55] <RikMills> let me see
[13:56] <ahasenack> RikMills: do you need to commit your kubuntu-settings change here as well? https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kubuntu-settings
[13:56] <ahasenack> your "upstream"
[13:56] <RikMills> utkarsh2102: it says (rebuilding)
[13:57] <RikMills> ahasenack: usually when I know it is accepted into the archive (in this case proposed)
[13:57] <ahasenack> RikMills: ok, cool
[13:57] <RikMills> it is ready to push
[13:59] <ahasenack> RikMills: is this change correct? THat's the verison in plucky: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Dnd5GQBdBN/
[13:59] <ahasenack> that's in kubuntu-meta
[14:00] <RikMills> ahasenack: yes, I did that in a pucky container. usually do that so have the latest germinate etc. some older versions don't handle things like alternate | depends
[14:01] <RikMills> *plucky
[14:01] <ahasenack> ok
[14:01] <utkarsh2102> RikMills: cool beans, let me know how that build goes
[14:01] <RikMills> utkarsh2102: will do. thanks
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-settings [source] (noble-proposed) [1:24.04.13]
[14:02] <ahasenack> RikMills: there is a kubuntu-meta in noble-proposed already: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/2065465
[14:02] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2065465 in kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] broken sub-menus on some 'systray' indicators" [High, Fix Committed]
[14:03] <ahasenack> last comment is actually mine, from october last year
[14:04] <RikMills> sigh..... why are these things not getting verified?
[14:05] <RikMills> sgmoore: ^^^
[14:05] <RikMills> that was yours?
[14:19] <andersson123> utkarsh2102: I was just checking the source code. I was under the impression we had gitops with cdimage and any cowboys were minimal, and what's running in prod is near enough what's in master. Is this not the case?
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (oracular-proposed/main) [2.66.1+24.10 => 2.67.1+24.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:27] <RikMills> utkarsh2102: still not pulling packages from proposed by the looks of it
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (noble-proposed/main) [2.66.1+24.04 => 2.67.1+24.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (focal-proposed/main) [2.66.1+20.04 => 2.67.1+20.04] (core)
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (jammy-proposed/main) [2.66.1+22.04 => 2.67.1+22.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (noble-proposed) [4.8.2-0ubuntu0~24.04.1]
[14:56] <RikMills> andersson123: kubuntu noble livefs is not installing packages from proposed
[15:27] <pushkarnk> Can someone restart this build https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rack-parser/0.7.0-3/+build/30147423 please? There's no build log attached.
[15:28] <cjwatson> pushkarnk: done
[15:28] <pushkarnk> thanks cjwatson!
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [amd64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [i386] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [arm64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [s390x] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:32] <utkarsh2102> andersson123
[16:32] <utkarsh2102> ugh
[16:32] <utkarsh2102> andersson123: it's a bit too different than i'd like
[16:32] <utkarsh2102> i can paste the actual cron deployed on the server :)
[16:32] <utkarsh2102> RikMills: hm, someone needs to investigate
[16:35] <andersson123> utkarsh2102: perhaps in our 24.04.2 retrospective we can look at the relevant diffs on cdimage master and see what we can do to minimise these cowboys?
[16:35] <utkarsh2102> maybe it doesn't have to be retro
[16:35] <utkarsh2102> someone should just do it
[16:36] <utkarsh2102> mwhudson: what d'you think?
[16:36] <utkarsh2102> is it okay to bring back the two files in sync?
[16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-amd64 [source] (noble-proposed) [27.2]
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-arm64 [source] (noble-proposed) [23.2]
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-riscv64 [source] (noble-proposed) [12.1]
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-ppc64el [source] (noble-proposed) [17.2]
[16:47] <ahasenack> mkukri: see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-amd64/+bug/2096766/comments/5 please
[16:47] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2096766 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu Noble) "Update cd-boot-images-* for Noble 24.04.2" [Critical, New]
[16:49] <mkukri> hmm that looks like the one, but i didnt generate the changes file so im not sure
[16:50] <ahasenack> the diff is https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/k7vhPJwxFs/
[16:51] <ahasenack> is that fixing both bugs?
[16:52] <ahasenack> mkukri: ^
[16:52] <mkukri> no oops 2062166 was an old bug that updated u-boot to the previous version
[16:52] <mkukri> for the current u-boot update there was no bug
[16:52] <mkukri> the changelog should say2096766, this is a typo and my bad
[16:55] <ahasenack> so where are we? I'm confused. What is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-riscv64/12.1 fixing?
[16:55] <mkukri> it is updating both grub and u-boot to the one in the updates pocket
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcdio [riscv64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.2.0-1~exp1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:56] <mkukri> ive updated 2096766 to say both grub and u-boot
[16:56] <mkukri> and ill try to get the riscv cdboot images reuploaded with the correct changelog
[17:01] <mkukri> so i guess can the current 12.1 be rejected? and then i can get it reuploaded with the correct changelog
[17:02] <ahasenack> it's accepted :/
[17:03] <ahasenack> is the change in 12.1 correct? Minus the changelog?
[17:04] <mkukri> yes
[17:04] <mkukri> its just had the wrong line copy pasted, ive updated the package versions just the bug number got missed
[17:04] <mkukri> maybe its not a huge deal just confusing
[17:04] <utkarsh2102> ok, no need to re-upload then?
[17:13] <ahasenack> hm
[17:13] <ahasenack> 12.1 is burned, we could go for 12.2 with the correct changelog, and explain that the previous changelog entry was fixing the wrong bug
[17:14] <ahasenack> I don't think we can/should just remove the package from proposed and pretend it never existed
[17:14] <ahasenack> although, it's probably not even published yet
[17:14] <ahasenack> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-riscv64/12.1
[17:14] <ahasenack> status: accepted
[17:15] <ahasenack> mkukri: what's the correct d/changelog?
[17:15] <mkukri> it's the same except the bug number should be the same one as the other arches
[17:15] <mkukri> s/2062166/2096766/
[17:21] <ahasenack> mkukri: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-riscv64/+bug/2062166 is "Rebuild against u-boot-sifive 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5"
[17:21] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2062166 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu Noble) "Rebuild against u-boot-sifive 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5" [Undecided, Fix Committed]
[17:21] <mkukri> yes and this is 5.1
[17:21] <ahasenack> and we now are rebuilding it against 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5.1
[17:21] <ahasenack> so is 2062166 being fixed anyway?
[17:22] <mkukri> it was already fixed i think?
[17:22] <mkukri> idk why its not set to fix released
[17:22] <mkukri> 5 was already in noble-updates
[17:22] <mkukri> or i mean noble release
[17:22] <ahasenack> yeah, comment #5
[17:23] <ahasenack> but the task was still "new"
[17:23] <ahasenack> looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-riscv64/+bug/2062166/+activity
[17:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2062166 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu Noble) "Rebuild against u-boot-sifive 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5" [Undecided, Fix Committed]
=== fuseteam1 is now known as fuseteam
[17:24] <ahasenack> weird
[17:24] <ahasenack> so it's fine I think
[17:24] <ahasenack> let me just run the sru machinery on the real bug, so we get the verification tags, sru accept comment, etc
[17:28] <ahasenack> mkukri: ok, let's leave it as is. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-amd64/+bug/2096766 has the proper tags now for the risc/noble task. We will just have to close it manually upon release into updates.
[17:28] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2096766 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu Noble) "Update cd-boot-images-* for Noble 24.04.2" [Critical, Fix Committed]
[17:28] <ahasenack> I added a comment to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-riscv64/+bug/2062166 hopefully explaining it
[17:28] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2062166 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu Noble) "Rebuild against u-boot-sifive 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5" [Undecided, Fix Committed]
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1]
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [i386] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1]
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1]
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1]
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1]
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [2.2.0-1~exp1]
[17:40] <ahasenack> release team: I added https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/2096974 to the 24.04.2 milestone, but the regression is still being investigated (in the sense of whether we should revert, or apply a fix on top)
[17:40] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2096974 in tzdata (Ubuntu) "tzdata-2024b-0ubuntu0.24.04 makes std::chrono unusable" [High, Triaged]
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (oracular-proposed) [3.107ubuntu13~24.10.2]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (noble-proposed) [3.107ubuntu13~24.04.2]
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfce4-panel [source] (noble-proposed) [4.18.4-1ubuntu0.1]
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (jammy-proposed) [4.8.2-0ubuntu0~22.04.1]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (focal-proposed) [4.8.2-0ubuntu0~20.04.1]
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (jammy-proposed) [3:25.2.1-0ubuntu2.8]
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: osinfo-db (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.20240701-1ubuntu1 => 0.20250124-0ubuntu0.24.10.1] (no packageset)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-distro-release-notifier (oracular-proposed/universe) [20220915-0ubuntu8 => 20220915-0ubuntu8.24.10.1] (no packageset)
[20:44] <arraybolt3> ubuntu-release: ^ Fixes the release upgrade notifier for Kubuntu Oracular, right now it's totally and completely broken, this makes it work again.
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: osinfo-db (noble-proposed/universe) [0.20240523-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 => 0.20250124-0ubuntu0.24.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: osinfo-db (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.20240523-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 0.20250124-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (oracular-proposed/main) [2024b-1ubuntu2.1 => 2024b-1ubuntu2.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (noble-proposed/main) [2024b-0ubuntu0.24.04 => 2024b-0ubuntu0.24.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:38] <arraybolt3> ubuntu-sru: ^ (sorry, mis-pinged the wrnog team)
[21:38] <arraybolt3> (re plasma-distro-release-notifier)
[21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (oracular-proposed) [2024b-1ubuntu2.2]
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (noble-proposed) [2024b-0ubuntu0.24.04.1]
[22:11] <mwhudson> utkarsh2102: are we talking about the crontab here? yes i don't see why they need to be so different
[22:11] <mwhudson> (also not here today)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlomiri-appmenutheme [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.66-1] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-jpeg-encoder [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-cellular [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: supernovas [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-phone [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-regex [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: psi-plus [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.4.1456-2.1] (no packageset)
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: supernovas [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-phone [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-jpeg-encoder [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: supernovas [armhf] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlomiri-appmenutheme [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.66-1] (no packageset)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: supernovas [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-cellular [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlomiri-appmenutheme [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.66-1] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-jpeg-encoder [armhf] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlomiri-appmenutheme [armhf] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.66-1] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-regex [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-phone [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-jpeg-encoder [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-system-settings-cellular [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: psi-plus [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.4.1456-2.1] (no packageset)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-regex [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1.0.2-1] (no packageset)