/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2025/01/31/#ubuntu-devel.txt

=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc
toabctltsimonq2, thx for sponsoring lp:#2097078 . I was still trying to find out if I should ping here or on matrix for sponsorship but now I realized it's already done :-)06:32
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2097078 in python-botocore (Ubuntu) "Sync python-botocore 1.36.9+repack-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/209707806:32
tsimonq2toabctl: Meh I'd say between now and March 1st, IRC if it's urgent, otherwise Matrix is okay :) (and that's subjective; I'm on both)06:35
tsimonq2And yw :)06:35
=== 082ABEWVI is now known as woky_
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: could I have help with the autopkgtests at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gtk4 ? it looks like gtk4 ought to have a depends on libpng >= 1.6.4512:47
jbichalibpng1.6 doesn't use a symbols file (probably it should and with Build-Depends-Package) and the shlibs file is only set to >= 1.6.2 . I don't see a way to fix this from src:gtk412:48
jbichaI guess I could hard-code libgtk-4-1 Depends: libpng16-16t64 (>= 1.6.45). I just don't normally do that12:49
ahasenackbdrung: I added an SRU template to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/2096974 with impact and test plan, but left "what could go wrong" and "other considerations" TBD. When you have a moment, could you please fill thouse out?13:04
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2096974 in tzdata (Ubuntu) "tzdata-2024b-0ubuntu0.24.04 makes std::chrono unusable" [High, Triaged]13:04
ahasenackbdrung: and, of course, if you spot something incorrect I wrote, feel free to ping me or fix it :)13:04
=== mmaunjhlhuzlvhqu is now known as hyilfwkzvmazwdck
=== hyilfwkzvmazwdck is now known as georgiag
schopinahasenack: is the tzdata thing for 24.04.2? If so I might take over, bdrung is at FOSDEM.13:08
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, sorry but according to the merged pull request, isn't the gtk4 version retro-compatible?13:11
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: the compatibility with old libpng is only at build time13:17
jbichaa hard-coded Depends does work for me, but I think it's less elegant (we had to remove a lot of hard-coded library depends for the t64 transition)13:18
ahasenackschopin: yes, the regression fix is for 24.04.213:50
adriencan someone sync m2crypto? the delta was to accomodate openssl 3.4 which contains a work-around for an issue in m2crypto and the debian package now has a better solution to that (which I came up with), thanks13:54
adrienand I plan to drop the work-around in openssl soon, which would make m2crypto ftbfs13:55
* schopin hands adrien requestsync13:59
adrienmy internet connection is unfortunately very spotty and one of the steps invariably ends up failing at the moment :'(14:01
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, which solution you think for libpng1.6? bump shlibs?14:09
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, if I bump shlibs are you happy with that?14:09
adrienmanaged to file a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/m2crypto/+bug/209710914:11
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2097109 in m2crypto (Ubuntu) "Sync m2crypto 0.42.0-2.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [High, Triaged]14:11
LocutusOfBorgSponsoring this sync for Adrien Nader (adrien)14:12
LocutusOfBorgSync this package [y|N]? y14:12
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, if you want me to upload with the bump of shlibs, the upload is ready to go14:13
adrienLocutusOfBorg: thanks!14:16
LocutusOfBorgyw!14:16
LocutusOfBorgand thanks for using requestync :D14:17
LocutusOfBorgit makes easier for sponsors14:17
LocutusOfBorg$ syncpackage -s adrien -f m2crypto -b 209710914:18
LocutusOfBorgand if in the future you wants to become MOTU, core-dev or whatever, we can find what was sponsored to you easily14:18
adrienah, I wasn't aware of that aspect14:18
adrienthe fact that it eased the syncpackage itself14:18
adrienand now, off the train :)14:18
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: bumping shlibs would fix my bug. However, usually C libraries in Ubuntu main use a symbols file14:36
LocutusOfBorgwould a symbols file been better in this case?14:37
LocutusOfBorghow?14:38
LocutusOfBorgI mean, the regression was not due to new/removed interfaces...14:38
LocutusOfBorgbut changed behaviour, right?14:38
* LocutusOfBorg uploaded14:38
LocutusOfBorg+ png_get_cICP @25014:40
LocutusOfBorg+ png_set_cICP @25114:40
jbichaif it used Build-Depends-Package, the binary dependency would have matched the version I set for libpng-dev in gtk4's Build-Depends14:40
LocutusOfBorgok got it14:40
jbichahttps://lintian.debian.org/tags/symbols-file-missing-build-depends-package-field.html14:40
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, if you want to provide one, feel free to commit :D14:40
LocutusOfBorgI think it can be the scripts/symbols.def, right?14:40
jbichaI have too much to try to do today14:40
ahasenackschopin: will you be able to look at tzdata?16:52
ahasenacknot that I"m going to release anything today16:52
ahasenackfrom an sru perspective, I would like the bug to have a bit more explanation about what the fix is (I'm not familiar with tzdata and the "rearguard" terminolofy for dataform16:54
schopinahasenack: I'll try to, and will at least sync with bdrung to have one of us do it.16:54
ahasenackand expanding what could go wrong (i.e., what does it mean to revert to this rearguard dataform, etc)16:54
ahasenackschopin: cool16:54
Eickmeyerenr0n: conversation with Skia in the Matrix equivalent of this chat, the fix bug 2078639 should go in ASAP. We've got thousands of Ubuntu Studio users unable to upgrade.16:54
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2078639 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Noble) "Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/207863916:54
ahasenackand then we need branches for focal and jammy, which won't benefit from that nice new dep8 test bdrung wrote, so I'm not sure how to test those two16:55
enr0nEickmeyer: okay, if the release team is okay with it then fine by me16:58
Eickmeyerenr0n: We tagged you in the chat (you seem to have a Matrix presence there)16:58
enr0nyeah I saw it now16:58
enr0ndidn't have the window open16:58
Eickmeyerhehe, no worries.16:58
tsimonq2mitchdz: Hey :) could you please send the Ubuntu delta for rabbitmq-server up to Debian? If I'm reading this correctly, just DEP-8 tests.17:07
tsimonq2(I stole your merge btw)17:07
ahasenacktsimonq2: are you merging 4.x?17:10
ahasenackhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2085277 I could certainly use the help, if you want to take over17:11
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2085277 in rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) "Merge rabbitmq-server from Debian unstable for plucky" [Undecided, New]17:11
ahasenackbut note we have this standing bug also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/207430917:11
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2074309 in rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Oracular) "upgrade 22.04 -> 24.04 won't start due to feature flags" [High, Confirmed]17:11
ahasenackwhich we don't know yet how to solve, and updating to 4.x won't make it worse I guess17:12
tsimonq2ahasenack: merging 4.x> Yup :)17:16
tsimonq2Looking at the bugs now17:16
tsimonq2(I also use rabbitmq-server at $dayjob, from the Ubuntu Archive, so I'll likely be digging further here.)17:17
ahasenackah, nice17:18
ahasenackwe don't have a plan for those upgrades, as upstream requires interim versions and a specific upgrade path, and we don't have those versions in ubuntu17:19
tsimonq2My first thought after reviewing the bugs is, if it's just as simple as config feature flags, this won't be as difficult as I thought. Wrap some kind of maintscript around those specific config values, and call it a day. I suspect it won't be that easy, though.17:24
tsimonq2Also, hmm, let's see how Debian Stable handles this...17:24
ahasenackthey never had this problem before, we were ahead of debian17:24
ahasenacknow debian will have it (with the 4.x version)17:24
tsimonq2Ah okay, that tracks17:25
ahasenackschopin: we might have a real regression with the 24.04.1 patch: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/astropy/noble/amd6417:25
schopinoh crap.17:26
ahasenackother arches, same failure17:27
ahasenack(and I retried there already)17:27
ahasenackone thing that's left, to be sure, is migration-reference/017:27
schopinWell, the failing test is about time, so I'd assume it's tzdata's fault.17:28
ahasenackwe have to determine by monday/tuesday at the latest how to proceed I think, if we can't find a fix for this. We might have to revert to 2024a for 24.04.217:28
ahasenack+really2024a kind of thing17:29

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!