| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| toabctl | tsimonq2, thx for sponsoring lp:#2097078 . I was still trying to find out if I should ping here or on matrix for sponsorship but now I realized it's already done :-) | 06:32 |
|---|---|---|
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2097078 in python-botocore (Ubuntu) "Sync python-botocore 1.36.9+repack-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2097078 | 06:32 | |
| tsimonq2 | toabctl: Meh I'd say between now and March 1st, IRC if it's urgent, otherwise Matrix is okay :) (and that's subjective; I'm on both) | 06:35 |
| tsimonq2 | And yw :) | 06:35 |
| === 082ABEWVI is now known as woky_ | ||
| jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: could I have help with the autopkgtests at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gtk4 ? it looks like gtk4 ought to have a depends on libpng >= 1.6.45 | 12:47 |
| jbicha | libpng1.6 doesn't use a symbols file (probably it should and with Build-Depends-Package) and the shlibs file is only set to >= 1.6.2 . I don't see a way to fix this from src:gtk4 | 12:48 |
| jbicha | I guess I could hard-code libgtk-4-1 Depends: libpng16-16t64 (>= 1.6.45). I just don't normally do that | 12:49 |
| ahasenack | bdrung: I added an SRU template to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/2096974 with impact and test plan, but left "what could go wrong" and "other considerations" TBD. When you have a moment, could you please fill thouse out? | 13:04 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2096974 in tzdata (Ubuntu) "tzdata-2024b-0ubuntu0.24.04 makes std::chrono unusable" [High, Triaged] | 13:04 | |
| ahasenack | bdrung: and, of course, if you spot something incorrect I wrote, feel free to ping me or fix it :) | 13:04 |
| === mmaunjhlhuzlvhqu is now known as hyilfwkzvmazwdck | ||
| === hyilfwkzvmazwdck is now known as georgiag | ||
| schopin | ahasenack: is the tzdata thing for 24.04.2? If so I might take over, bdrung is at FOSDEM. | 13:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, sorry but according to the merged pull request, isn't the gtk4 version retro-compatible? | 13:11 |
| jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: the compatibility with old libpng is only at build time | 13:17 |
| jbicha | a hard-coded Depends does work for me, but I think it's less elegant (we had to remove a lot of hard-coded library depends for the t64 transition) | 13:18 |
| ahasenack | schopin: yes, the regression fix is for 24.04.2 | 13:50 |
| adrien | can someone sync m2crypto? the delta was to accomodate openssl 3.4 which contains a work-around for an issue in m2crypto and the debian package now has a better solution to that (which I came up with), thanks | 13:54 |
| adrien | and I plan to drop the work-around in openssl soon, which would make m2crypto ftbfs | 13:55 |
| * schopin hands adrien requestsync | 13:59 | |
| adrien | my internet connection is unfortunately very spotty and one of the steps invariably ends up failing at the moment :'( | 14:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, which solution you think for libpng1.6? bump shlibs? | 14:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, if I bump shlibs are you happy with that? | 14:09 |
| adrien | managed to file a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/m2crypto/+bug/2097109 | 14:11 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2097109 in m2crypto (Ubuntu) "Sync m2crypto 0.42.0-2.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [High, Triaged] | 14:11 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | Sponsoring this sync for Adrien Nader (adrien) | 14:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Sync this package [y|N]? y | 14:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, if you want me to upload with the bump of shlibs, the upload is ready to go | 14:13 |
| adrien | LocutusOfBorg: thanks! | 14:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yw! | 14:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and thanks for using requestync :D | 14:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it makes easier for sponsors | 14:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | $ syncpackage -s adrien -f m2crypto -b 2097109 | 14:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and if in the future you wants to become MOTU, core-dev or whatever, we can find what was sponsored to you easily | 14:18 |
| adrien | ah, I wasn't aware of that aspect | 14:18 |
| adrien | the fact that it eased the syncpackage itself | 14:18 |
| adrien | and now, off the train :) | 14:18 |
| jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: bumping shlibs would fix my bug. However, usually C libraries in Ubuntu main use a symbols file | 14:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | would a symbols file been better in this case? | 14:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | how? | 14:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I mean, the regression was not due to new/removed interfaces... | 14:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but changed behaviour, right? | 14:38 |
| * LocutusOfBorg uploaded | 14:38 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | + png_get_cICP @250 | 14:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | + png_set_cICP @251 | 14:40 |
| jbicha | if it used Build-Depends-Package, the binary dependency would have matched the version I set for libpng-dev in gtk4's Build-Depends | 14:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok got it | 14:40 |
| jbicha | https://lintian.debian.org/tags/symbols-file-missing-build-depends-package-field.html | 14:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, if you want to provide one, feel free to commit :D | 14:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I think it can be the scripts/symbols.def, right? | 14:40 |
| jbicha | I have too much to try to do today | 14:40 |
| ahasenack | schopin: will you be able to look at tzdata? | 16:52 |
| ahasenack | not that I"m going to release anything today | 16:52 |
| ahasenack | from an sru perspective, I would like the bug to have a bit more explanation about what the fix is (I'm not familiar with tzdata and the "rearguard" terminolofy for dataform | 16:54 |
| schopin | ahasenack: I'll try to, and will at least sync with bdrung to have one of us do it. | 16:54 |
| ahasenack | and expanding what could go wrong (i.e., what does it mean to revert to this rearguard dataform, etc) | 16:54 |
| ahasenack | schopin: cool | 16:54 |
| Eickmeyer | enr0n: conversation with Skia in the Matrix equivalent of this chat, the fix bug 2078639 should go in ASAP. We've got thousands of Ubuntu Studio users unable to upgrade. | 16:54 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2078639 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Noble) "Ubuntu Studio upgrade, pipewire <-> pulseaudio conflict" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2078639 | 16:54 | |
| ahasenack | and then we need branches for focal and jammy, which won't benefit from that nice new dep8 test bdrung wrote, so I'm not sure how to test those two | 16:55 |
| enr0n | Eickmeyer: okay, if the release team is okay with it then fine by me | 16:58 |
| Eickmeyer | enr0n: We tagged you in the chat (you seem to have a Matrix presence there) | 16:58 |
| enr0n | yeah I saw it now | 16:58 |
| enr0n | didn't have the window open | 16:58 |
| Eickmeyer | hehe, no worries. | 16:58 |
| tsimonq2 | mitchdz: Hey :) could you please send the Ubuntu delta for rabbitmq-server up to Debian? If I'm reading this correctly, just DEP-8 tests. | 17:07 |
| tsimonq2 | (I stole your merge btw) | 17:07 |
| ahasenack | tsimonq2: are you merging 4.x? | 17:10 |
| ahasenack | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2085277 I could certainly use the help, if you want to take over | 17:11 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2085277 in rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) "Merge rabbitmq-server from Debian unstable for plucky" [Undecided, New] | 17:11 | |
| ahasenack | but note we have this standing bug also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2074309 | 17:11 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2074309 in rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Oracular) "upgrade 22.04 -> 24.04 won't start due to feature flags" [High, Confirmed] | 17:11 | |
| ahasenack | which we don't know yet how to solve, and updating to 4.x won't make it worse I guess | 17:12 |
| tsimonq2 | ahasenack: merging 4.x> Yup :) | 17:16 |
| tsimonq2 | Looking at the bugs now | 17:16 |
| tsimonq2 | (I also use rabbitmq-server at $dayjob, from the Ubuntu Archive, so I'll likely be digging further here.) | 17:17 |
| ahasenack | ah, nice | 17:18 |
| ahasenack | we don't have a plan for those upgrades, as upstream requires interim versions and a specific upgrade path, and we don't have those versions in ubuntu | 17:19 |
| tsimonq2 | My first thought after reviewing the bugs is, if it's just as simple as config feature flags, this won't be as difficult as I thought. Wrap some kind of maintscript around those specific config values, and call it a day. I suspect it won't be that easy, though. | 17:24 |
| tsimonq2 | Also, hmm, let's see how Debian Stable handles this... | 17:24 |
| ahasenack | they never had this problem before, we were ahead of debian | 17:24 |
| ahasenack | now debian will have it (with the 4.x version) | 17:24 |
| tsimonq2 | Ah okay, that tracks | 17:25 |
| ahasenack | schopin: we might have a real regression with the 24.04.1 patch: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/astropy/noble/amd64 | 17:25 |
| schopin | oh crap. | 17:26 |
| ahasenack | other arches, same failure | 17:27 |
| ahasenack | (and I retried there already) | 17:27 |
| ahasenack | one thing that's left, to be sure, is migration-reference/0 | 17:27 |
| schopin | Well, the failing test is about time, so I'd assume it's tzdata's fault. | 17:28 |
| ahasenack | we have to determine by monday/tuesday at the latest how to proceed I think, if we can't find a fix for this. We might have to revert to 2024a for 24.04.2 | 17:28 |
| ahasenack | +really2024a kind of thing | 17:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!