[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (focal-proposed/universe) [2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.5 => 2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.6] (kernel-dkms) [09:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-aioswitcher [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [4.0.2-1] [09:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tools-build-clojure [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [0.10.6+ds-1] [11:12] ubuntu-release: kubuntu has no plucky daily ISO today https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily-live/current/ [11:12] despite logs saying the build was done 2hrs + ago [11:13] network/infra issue on the copy over? [11:59] RikMills: hey, indeed, infra has been acting up today, arm builders are clogging [12:07] RikMills: LP: #2096722 processed ;) [12:07] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2096722 in calligraplan (Ubuntu) "RM: Please remove calligraplan from plucky - kdiagram transition" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2096722 [12:08] utkarsh2102: ty:) [12:08] may have another shortly.... [12:17] sure [12:17] processed some nbs \o/ [12:17] have capacity for 1 more and then 24.04.2 bits [12:23] utkarsh2102: qt6 tellico synced fron debian no longer builds on ppc64el riscv64 and s390x due to no qt6webwengine on those arches [12:23] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tellico/4.1-1 [12:23] so needs binaries for those arches removed in release pocket [12:24] I can file a bug if needed/wanted [12:24] jbicha: processed LP: #2096748. [12:24] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2096748 in looking-glass (Debian) "Remove looking-glass from Ubuntu: unsupportable" [Unknown, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2096748 [12:24] but it is a simple issue [12:27] RikMills: tellico has a different version in proposed and a different one in release. the one in -proposed is fine? [12:27] and we want to drop those binaries in -release pocket only? [12:28] utkarsh2102: yes [12:29] delete binaries for ppc64el riscv64 and s390x in release pocket only [12:29] there are none now on those arches in proposed, due to the qtwebengine build dep in the new tellico [12:30] so they need to go away in release for britney to be ok migrating it [12:40] RikMills: should be done! o/ [12:42] utkarsh2102: thanks again :) [12:43] please yell at me if something's not right there [12:49] RikMills: I decided to file LP: #2097538 so that there's trace of what I did, in case someone yells at me or if I did something that should be reverted, haha [12:49] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2097538 in tellico (Ubuntu) "remove s390x, riscv64, ppc64el binaries from the -release pocket" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2097538 [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adsys (oracular-proposed/main) [0.15.2ubuntu0.1 => 0.16.2~24.10] (no packageset) [13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adsys (noble-proposed/main) [0.14.3~24.04ubuntu0.1 => 0.16.2~24.04] (no packageset) [13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adsys (jammy-proposed/main) [0.14.3~22.04ubuntu0.1 => 0.16.2~22.04] (no packageset) [14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: evqueue-core (plucky-proposed/primary) [2.1-1build6] [14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libpreludedb (plucky-proposed/primary) [5.2.0-2.2build4] [14:28] Hi release team, can you reject the above evqueue-core and libpreludedb? Just realized they were removed from plucky [14:31] sgmoore: RikMills: plasma-workspace on Noble stopped phasing, because of a small increase in crash-rate (https://errors.ubuntu.com/?release=Ubuntu%2024.04&package=plasma-workspace&period=day&version=4%3A5.27.12-0ubuntu0.1 & https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/phased-updates.html) [14:32] Skia: this is not uncommen [14:32] you might want to decide to resume phasing by opening an MP against https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sru/ubuntu-archive-tools/phased-update-overrides [14:33] bzr? OMG [14:33] :D [14:36] yep, sorry, I'm doing my best to get some nice and friendly AAs to migrate it (:wink: ubuntu-archive) [14:38] (gratuitous pinging of those AAs is not the best way to get them nice and friendly, IMHO...) [14:41] Presumably you'd actually want to harass^W ask nicely the SRU folks for this migration: first step is to convert the repo, and they own that. [14:43] Which reminds me: dbungert, FYI, the bugpattern transition is in my backlog, rather towards the top. [14:48] schopin: right, okay, sorry, I'll try to come up with a better plan for this. It's just that this has hit me two time in two days, and I can't see that `bzr` stuff anymore [14:48] not after dealing with the error-tracker and its 11 known repos [14:52] we'll do something about it after the release [14:56] ♥ [15:02] Skia: ahasenack https://code.launchpad.net/~rikmills/ubuntu-archive-tools/phased-update-overrides/+merge/480780 [15:03] * RikMills gratefully goes back to git [15:03] thanks! [15:08] schopin: I appreciate it [15:09] lvoytek: NEW queue is AAs territory. On it :) [15:10] schopin: Thanks! [15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mofed-modules-24.10 [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [24.10.0.7.0.0+ds1-0ubuntu1~24.10.1] [15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected evqueue-core [source] (plucky-proposed) [2.1-1build6] [15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libpreludedb [source] (plucky-proposed) [5.2.0-2.2build4] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (noble-proposed/main) [20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2.8 => 20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2.9] (core, kernel) [16:07] schopin: whilst you're here, can you do the apport verification, please? [16:07] we'd like to release this to -updates soon. [16:08] utkarsh2102: I'll have to check with the LP folks, we've hit a small snag there. [16:08] uh oh [16:08] something something that we don't want to hear? :) [16:08] They had the gall of actually *fixing their stuff* on qastaging too! [16:09] ah, okay [16:09] d'you have an ETA on the verification? no rush, just asking so we can plan better from our side [16:10] I'll get back to you. [16:10] But I'm strongly hoping for before EOW [16:11] thank you! [16:11] we'd like to build candidates on Monday [17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (jammy-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu82.6 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.7] (core, i386-whitelist) [17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bctoolbox [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [5.3.104-1] (kubuntu) [18:11] RikMills: hello! we need to do something about LP: #2096990 with whatever we have :( [18:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2096990 in kubuntu-settings (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Noble - calamares minimal install removes kubuntu-desktop metapackage and kubuntu-settings-desktop" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2096990 [18:11] CC: ahasenack^ [18:12] now, I understand the problem but unfortunately, we don't have an immediate fix for it right now. [18:13] so either we a) drop this for 24.04.2 if you're ok, or b) see what ubuntu-sru feels about bending rules for this one given this is very specific to kubuntu so if the flavour lead signs off, I'd like to see what they think about it? [18:13] we need to decide what we're doing and take actions *now*ish so we don't have last moment oh-nos for 24.04.2 [18:14] RikMills: let me know what you think? [18:19] utkarsh2102: I'll hesitate in fully speaking for RikMills, but the minimal install removing those metapackages certainly strikes me as a release blocker. [18:20] I don't want to get lost in bikeshedding on when, where, who, how, why... but in the past there has been precedent to either delay 24.04.2, or expedite the SRU, whatever has a more minimal impact. [18:21] I'll also tag Eickmeyer arraybolt3 sgmoore since they have somewhat of a stake in it too, but IMO the recommendation here should be to expedite testing of that SRU and get it released todayish. [18:23] regarding testing, what about that bug where the image builder does not pick up packages from proposed? [18:23] won't that block this testing? [18:24] Meh... yes and no. It would certainly be 10x cleaner to get that underlying issue fixed, but Some Hacks could be done to test it outside of that. [18:25] (And yes, that's me volunteering to do Such Hacks if the determination is to move forward with the SRU todayish.) [18:25] I accepted half of that bug on the 30th (kubuntu-settings) [18:26] and couldn't accept kubuntu-meta because there was one in proposed already [18:26] that was fixed later, and timo accepted kubuntu-meta on the 3rd [18:26] so yeah, expedite testing. Without testing I cannot even begin to say if this can be released or not. [18:27] Roger that. [18:27] tomorrow it just won't be released, that's for sure, which leaves us monday then [18:27] and even about releases today, I'm definitely not fond of having to do a revert on a friday, so let's hope we won't have to :) [18:28] Monday gets a bit tight but is definitely doable, especially for such a targeted fix. And agreed ;) [18:28] * tsimonq2 syncs ISOs [18:28] * Eickmeyer is getting ISOs ready for testing [18:28] tsimonq2: jinx [18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cura [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-6] (no packageset) [18:29] I did consider the scope when I looked at this (kubuntu), and who is requesting it (kubuntu leads) [18:32] the idea of delaying 24.04.2 sits in some other universe, not this one :) [18:33] thanks for taking a look at that! [18:33] but don't we have MOTUs? [18:33] which universe, depends :) [18:33] i'd like to build candidates on Monday but that can happen on Tuesday for Kubuntu, that's fine [18:33] or even Wednesday [18:34] but let's see how far we get with the testing, et al [18:34] (I may wait the Launchpad publisher cycles to do this The Right Way and spin up a livefs, so ~= 2-3 hours.) [18:57] RikMills: about https://code.launchpad.net/~rikmills/ubuntu-archive-tools/phased-update-overrides/+merge/480780, I'd like to wait for the next phased-updated run [18:57] it might clear [18:58] that is usually the case when it's a small uptick [19:02] doko: could you promote automake-1.17 to main and remove automake-1.16 for plucky? [19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bctoolbox [armhf] (plucky-proposed/universe) [5.3.104-1] (kubuntu) [19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bctoolbox [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [5.3.104-1] (kubuntu) [19:18] utkarsh2102: Initial testing of Kubuntu 24.04 is showing that none of the expected packages from -proposed are there. This means there's a bug in `livecd-rootfs` in which `PROPOSED=1` is having no effect. [19:33] https://launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/kubuntu/ [19:35] ^^ in an ideal world, that pending livefs will pass, use Proposed, and the manifest will reflect the changes. [19:35] Oh right, this is Noble, so not layered... just version changes on the manifest, I suppose. [19:36] * tsimonq2 will put full instructions + testing steps on the bug report with my verification results [19:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bctoolbox [s390x] (plucky-proposed/universe) [5.3.104-1] (kubuntu) [19:52] Perfect: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/774918032/livecd.kubuntu.manifest [20:15] tsimonq2: so uyou have an iso with that? [20:15] *you [20:17] RikMills: Close. Taking the latest Noble daily, downloading the livefs onto a separate partition, then doing the install with the downloaded livefses. Configurable via Calamares. [20:17] Effectively the same thing. [20:17] aha. yes [20:18] Latest livefs in https://launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/kubuntu is testing with a different way to do proposed=True, let's see if that works. Regardless, PPA builds are binary copies, so should be usable all the same. [20:29] Nope. Definitely a livecd-rootfs bug. [20:29] mwhudson: You may find that interesting ^ [21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bctoolbox [riscv64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [5.3.104-1] (kubuntu) [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bctoolbox [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [5.3.104-1] (kubuntu) [21:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntucinnamon-meta (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.4 => 24.04.4.1] (no packageset) [22:08] ubuntu-release, ubuntu-sru: Ubuntu Cinnamon 24.04.2 blocker in bug 2064166: unwanted app being installed. Seed and meta have been adjusted, awaiting approval [22:08] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2064166 in ubuntucinnamon-meta (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2064166 [22:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntucinnamon-meta [source] (noble-proposed) [24.04.4.1] [22:28] Eickmeyer, ^ [22:31] apw: Thanks! [22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bctoolbox [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [5.3.104-1] [22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bctoolbox [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [5.3.104-1] [22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bctoolbox [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [5.3.104-1] [22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cura [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [5.0.0-6] [22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bctoolbox [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [5.3.104-1] [22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bctoolbox [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [5.3.104-1] [22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bctoolbox [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [5.3.104-1]