/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2025/04/18/#ubuntu-server.txt

=== JanC is now known as Guest4547
=== ubuntu_4321 is now known as ubuntu4321
patdkis there any way to make this work on ubuntu 24.04 anymore?08:23
patdkapt-get install ./apache2-bin*.deb ./apache2-data*.deb08:23
patdkNote, selecting 'apache2-bin' instead of './apache2-bin_2.4.58-1ubuntu8.6_amd64.deb'08:23
moo3its not the latest version?08:25
patdkI dont get the question08:26
moo3it is the latest in the repo08:26
patdkbut why is it installing from the repo and ignoring the deb file I told it to install08:26
patdkit didn't used to do this08:26
patdkwhy would it reach halfway across the planet to download and install it, when it is sitting right there08:27
moo31. try with apt and not apt-get 2. does it behave differently after you move source.list and apt update? 3. you can always dpkg -i ofc08:28
patdkremoving source.list and dpkg -i wont work08:28
patdkit wont install any dependencies then08:28
moo3ah of course it won't, and you don't want to download all the dependencies deb packages?08:29
patdkI just want it to install the rebuilt local package08:30
patdkI dont understand why it says, your package is stupid, I'll install this other one instead08:30
patdkit's been working fine like this since 12.0408:31
patdkonly having problems on 24.0408:31
moo3i tried it on my pc and i see what you mean08:38
patdkit's normal docker behavue :(08:39
patdkdocker rebuilds a package and installs it08:39
moo3two ways i guess might work, its either you unpack the deb package, change its version and pack it again. or install with dpkg and use apt install -f to install the deps08:40
moo3also, afaik we couldn't install local packages using apt and apt-get, we use to use gdebi for that08:48
ice925.04.1 is the LTS version right?10:14
moo3no ice9 10:20
moo324.04 and 26.0410:20
ice9moo3, so why 24.04 can't upgrade to 25.04 if "lts" is set10:21
ice9if I set it to normal, it see the new release10:21
moo3because 25.05 is not lts10:22
moo325.04*10:22
ice9moo3, ah it's every 2 years the LTS is released?10:24
moo3exactly10:26
=== jgee037988 is now known as jgee03798
=== jgee037981 is now known as jgee03798
samy1028Hello all, we've run into an interesting issue on a newly deployed Ubuntu 22.04 FIPS (which just got certified in February).  It comes with OpenSSL 3.0.2.  We use Dovecot and with the cipher secp521r1, which is a supported cipher, when generating a keypair it throws ERROR: error:1C800070:Provider routines::invalid salt length15:28
samy1028I found one entry in OpenSSL Github:  https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/2496215:29
-ubottu:#ubuntu-server- Issue 24962 in openssl/openssl "Once Fips is enable can't encrypt/decrypt file on version 3.0.2-fips" [Open]15:29
samy1028Has anyone else run into a similar issue or is it that Ubuntu 22.04 FIPS is too new for it to be widely used and/or reported?15:29
samy1028If we can't find a solution, it looks like we'll have to stick with Ubuntu 20.04 FIPS on Azure for the time being.15:30
JanCif you are an Ubuntu Pro customer it's probably best to report it to Canonical?15:36
samy1028We're not directly a Pro customer except through Azure.  I don't know what that gains us.  Though I have reported issues in the past to Canonical.  I'll have to dig up my login for that as it's been about a year and a half.15:44
JanCI don't know how that works (if you have to report to Azure or Canonical...)  :)15:46
=== Wyly6 is now known as Wyly
geniiWill the who command show an user as logged in if they are curently sending a file to the server with scp?19:12
geniiI got the answer now ( which is "no" ) from #linuxm in case anyone else was also wondering19:19
genii #linuxm/#linux19:19
moo3thanks genii 19:28
=== JanC is now known as Guest8625
=== ubuntu_4321 is now known as ubuntu4321

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!