| === kelt0m is now known as Guest728 | ||
| === kelt0m_ is now known as kelt0m | ||
| === Guest8110 is now known as kelt0m | ||
| meustation | on the desktop computer next to the laptop I'm writing from, I have a Live LTS.iso running through Ventoy from a usb drive. it is currently displaying the wrong time in the clock; what command would I have to launch from a cli to correct the mistake? would it require sudo? | 01:25 |
|---|---|---|
| leftyfb | meustation: settings the clock requires sudo | 01:30 |
| meustation | leftyfb, ok. can you point me to either the manpage of the required command, or give me the syntax I should use? | 01:36 |
| leftyfb | meustation: timedatectl | 01:36 |
| bucky | meustation: if you went in settings and set the time zone it would probably be ok | 01:36 |
| bucky | meustation: no DE? is this server? | 01:37 |
| meustation | bucky, from the desktop environment, right clicking got me to the format settings, but there's no way to change the hour. I suspect this is because the DE obviously does not have super user privileges | 01:39 |
| meustation | also, the more I use bash, the better I'll get at it | 01:39 |
| bucky | meustation: sudo timedatectl set-time 'YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS' | 01:40 |
| meustation | said desktop is destined to run the third server of my career, as soon as I'm done studying the docs and feel confident enough to go ahead and install it without supervision | 01:47 |
| meustation | thank you all; it didn't work, but because it says it's getting the time from the net. I just had to adjust the timezone, which was indeed possible from the DE without sudo | 01:48 |
| * meustation wishes a happy near and distant future to ev'body | 01:48 | |
| === Guest3482 is now known as B1T | ||
| === Sidewyz1 is now known as Sidewyz | ||
| === seaner4 is now known as seaner | ||
| B1T | c/ | 05:37 |
| === jbeautifulld is now known as stableless | ||
| stableless | tp | 05:45 |
| === mrpond56887 is now known as mrpond5688 | ||
| === tonb1299 is now known as tonb1298 | ||
| ferkle | hello | 08:08 |
| bucky | hello | 08:08 |
| === tonb1299 is now known as tonb1298 | ||
| syeonit | The device I'm using is a year younger than me LoL | 09:54 |
| BluesKaj | Hi all | 10:46 |
| === Geronimo0 is now known as Geronimo | ||
| CrtxReavr | If I type 'man man' it displays the page as it should, but when I quite out of the pager, this gets printed to my terminal: man: can't resolve man7/groff_man.7 | 16:00 |
| rfm | CrtxReavr interesting, does it for me too (26.04) | 16:04 |
| CrtxReavr | https://askubuntu.com/questions/1521258/what-means-cant-resolve-man7-groff-man-7 | 16:04 |
| CrtxReavr | Not a new issue I guess. | 16:04 |
| CrtxReavr | This is Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS | 16:04 |
| CrtxReavr | Glitch in the matrix. | 16:05 |
| jStefan | there is a section 7 that would require the groff package to be installed | 16:07 |
| jStefan | you could do: man 1 man, if you only need to read section 1 | 16:07 |
| CrtxReavr | It's pretty squarely in the "weird but harmless" catagory. . . I just noticed it by testing my manpage colorizaton settings. | 16:10 |
| rfm | problem goes all the way back to Debian, it's filed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101827 | 16:19 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu- Debian bug 1101827 in manpages "man: can't resolve man7/groff_man.7" [Minor, Open] | 16:19 | |
| tuxick | haha | 16:40 |
| === ancientz1 is now known as ancientz | ||
| dexter19 | hello | 17:41 |
| dexter19 | is there anyone out there ? | 17:42 |
| gordonjcp | dexter19: probably quite a lot of people but given the time most of them are likely to be eating their dinner | 17:45 |
| dexter19 | yea probably, although for me its 19:47. I just installed icr client app and checking out this whole icr thing | 17:48 |
| dexter19 | typical, as soon as I join in, people are leaving xd | 17:52 |
| gordonjcp | heh | 17:52 |
| tomreyn | it's a support channel, there's also #ubuntu-offtopic for colloquial chat | 17:52 |
| gordonjcp | dexter19: there's #ubuntu-offtopic if you just want to chat | 17:52 |
| gordonjcp | tomreyn: jinx | 17:52 |
| === leftyfb_ is now known as leftyfb | ||
| dexter19 | thanks, i will look into it | 17:52 |
| gordonjcp | dexter19: there used to be general discussion in here but now it's just where people play IdleRPG | 17:53 |
| dexter19 | this channel was the first to be recommended | 17:53 |
| leftyfb | gordonjcp: it's always been a support channel. | 17:55 |
| gordonjcp | leftyfb: it did also have more "social" discussion about what people were *doing* with Ubuntu | 17:55 |
| krascovict | eu achei um sistema de mensageria que usa criptografia militar... xpenv.com | 17:57 |
| gordonjcp | krascovict: !br | 17:57 |
| gordonjcp | bah | 17:57 |
| leftyfb | !br | krascovict | 17:57 |
| ubottu | krascovict: Por favor, use #ubuntu-br para ajuda em português. Para entrar no canal por favor faça "/join #ubuntu-br" sem as aspas. Para a comunidade local portuguêsa, use #ubuntu-pt. Obrigada. | 17:57 |
| gordonjcp | yes, that's what I meant | 17:57 |
| leftyfb | also complete spam | 17:58 |
| gordonjcp | krascovict: also "military grade encryption" is, uh, not good | 17:58 |
| gordonjcp | built down to a price by the lowest bidder | 17:58 |
| Manouchehri | cbreak: it depends on what hardware you're using. WireGuard does work pretty dang well on most things, but it's hard to beat AES-NI + ESP offloading. | 18:09 |
| leftyfb | Manouchehri: you're responding to a conversation that happened 25 hours ago | 18:13 |
| Manouchehri | leftyfb: because I just saw the message now, and my response is still applicable and might be useful? | 18:13 |
| no_internet | leftyfb: I don't think many people actually use IRC nowadays, at least not activiely | 19:52 |
| no_internet | bot btw, beep boop! <3 | 19:52 |
| enyc | We are here but you close out so quiclk! | 20:14 |
| enyc | and in lots of other channels! | 20:14 |
| JanC | Manouchehri: and then get hacked by a local user ;) | 20:36 |
| Manouchehri | JanC: how would IPsec get you hacked by a local user..? | 20:36 |
| JanC | Manouchehri: there have been several local privilege escalation exploits recently, at least 2 of them based on bugs in esp | 20:45 |
| JanC | in esp kernel modules | 20:45 |
| Manouchehri | JanC: mhm, been aware of that for awhile. People shouldn't be running different users on the same system without at *least* a VM barrier between. i.e. a local user shouldn't be on the same Linux install as your networking stuff. | 20:47 |
| Manouchehri | password sudo is stupid imo | 20:49 |
| Manouchehri | should be passwordless so people never had a false sense of security to begin with | 20:49 |
| JanC | sudo isn't particularly relevant | 20:50 |
| Manouchehri | JanC: these recent bugs are barely any different than just running `sudo`. | 20:50 |
| JanC | and of course in theory the esp bugs could have been in wireguard and then that would have been the problem, which is why I used ";)" | 20:52 |
| JanC | (although maybe wireguard has better code, dunno) | 20:52 |
| JanC | but yeah, a VMs are safer than containers for this sort of thing | 20:53 |
| Manouchehri | JanC: I can't think of a qemu breakout that worked with default settings when using KVM + virtio net + no GPU :) | 20:55 |
| Manouchehri | *recent | 20:55 |
| === IL_code is now known as Babaj | ||
| JanC | Manouchehri: but you can never be 100% certain, I guess | 21:13 |
| Manouchehri | JanC: that goes for anything in life. There's real mitigations that are easy to add imo. | 21:13 |
| JanC | and of course VMs have performance penalties compared to containers | 21:13 |
| JanC | so it's always a matter of risk calculation | 21:15 |
| Manouchehri | JanC: we're talking like <10%, often less than what the Linux kernel has added for other mitigations for CPU bugs | 21:16 |
| JanC | but still relevant for some | 21:20 |
| JanC | anyway; just pointing out that decisions like the choice of VPN might have unintended consequences | 21:21 |
| JanC | higher performance is not always better | 21:22 |
| gordonjcp | leftyfb: the neat thing about IRC is that it's very asynchronous | 21:24 |
| === IL_code is now known as Babaj | ||
| JanC | I can't really judge the quality of code between IPsec & WG, but at least in this case choosing IPsec over WG based on performance might not have turned out well | 21:26 |
| JanC | in some cases | 21:26 |
| Thalpius | hello | 23:01 |
| tomreyn | hello Thalpius | 23:01 |
| Thalpius | how are you | 23:02 |
| tomreyn | good, thanks. and i hope the same applies to you. do you have an ubuntu support question for this support channel today? | 23:02 |
| jStefan | bug 2150244 post #15 | 23:07 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu- Bug 2150244 in mesa (Ubuntu Stonking) "[nouveau] [zink] gnome-shell crashes with free(): invalid pointer" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2150244 | 23:07 | |
| === jedarc1 is now known as jedarc | ||
| === jedarc1 is now known as jedarc | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!