| lubot | <SamuelBanya> This is my latest try for arc. I read through the guides to make sure my quiltrc was the same and that arc was installed. I modified the quiltrc only in my /etc folder. | 01:46 |
|---|---|---|
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> That being said I git cloned from the ssh version of the Calamares settings repo | 01:47 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> I then did my changes | 01:47 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Then git add -A | 01:47 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> arc diff | 01:47 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Then I received this (see pic): | 01:48 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> (Photo, 1280x720) https://i.imgur.com/iOdgarM.jpg | 01:48 |
| lubot | <teward001> and you confirmed your remote is Phab? | 01:49 |
| lubot | <teward001> `git remote -v` | 01:49 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> I don't think he has push access | 01:53 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Hmm | 01:53 |
| lubot | <teward001> @tsimonq2 that said I technically don't have push access to anything even though you gave me perms | 01:54 |
| lubot | <teward001> and it's not a key issue | 01:54 |
| lubot | <teward001> :P | 01:55 |
| lubot | <teward001> *blames @tsimonq2 again* | 01:55 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Hmm | 02:03 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Lemme check that remote idea | 02:04 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> (Photo, 1280x720) https://i.imgur.com/kuTTImb.jpg | 02:05 |
| lubot | <teward001> yep that means that you don't have push access heh | 02:05 |
| lubot | <teward001> which means @tsimonq2 needs to fix you up | 02:05 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Ah I see | 02:05 |
| lubot | <teward001> or wxl | 02:05 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Did I follow the steps though? | 02:05 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Just making sure cause I actually read through most of the applicable parts of that arc guide and contribution guide too | 02:06 |
| lubot | <teward001> y'all know Lubuntu installation with encryption was broken yes? | 04:18 |
| lubot | <teward001> ran into a few people griping about it on the Ubuntu Hideout discord server where I'm a mod | 04:18 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @teward001 [y'all know Lubuntu installation with encryption was broken yes?], Have you read the release notes? | 04:38 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> And have they? | 04:38 |
| lubot | <brli7848> #RTFM somehow won't work in this case? lol | 04:43 |
| apt-ghetto | @Thomas Ward: Yes, the Lubuntu installation with encryption is broken. For an UEFI installation have a look at https://phab.lubuntu.me/T136 | 09:00 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [Unbreak Now!, Open] Fix EFI/encryption: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T136 | 09:00 | |
| apt-ghetto | The Lubuntu installation in BIOS mode with encryption "works", but in a different way then all the other *bbuntus with Ubiquity. | 09:02 |
| lubot | <fwapy> err | 11:19 |
| lubot | <fwapy> where do i "pr" to | 11:19 |
| apt-ghetto | pr means pull request? | 11:22 |
| lubot | <fwapy> yes | 12:49 |
| apt-ghetto | If you have forked a project on your github account, upload the commit to your github account and create a pull request | 12:51 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> anyone here that uses KDE knows which app is the one that install privative drivers in kde? | 12:51 |
| lubot | <fwapy> @apt-ghetto [<apt-ghetto> If you have forked a project on your github account, upload the com …], wait you guys dont have a gerrit or something? | 12:52 |
| lubot | <fwapy> @HMollerCl [anyone here that uses KDE knows which app is the one that install privative driv …], app? | 12:53 |
| apt-ghetto | no, lubuntu uses phabricator | 12:53 |
| lubot | <fwapy> @apt-ghetto [<apt-ghetto> no, lubuntu uses phabricator], ah similar i guess | 12:53 |
| apt-ghetto | not really | 12:53 |
| lubot | <fwapy> oh | 12:53 |
| lubot | <fwapy> ic | 12:53 |
| lubot | <fwapy> i'll do some searching | 12:53 |
| apt-ghetto | github.com/lubuntu-team | 12:54 |
| apt-ghetto | if you like to use github | 12:54 |
| apt-ghetto | or you can use your github credentials to create an account on phab.lubuntu.me | 12:54 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @fwapy [app?], I don't know how to call the piece of gui software that can do that | 12:54 |
| lubot | <fwapy> oki | 12:54 |
| lubot | <fwapy> @HMollerCl [I don't know how to call the piece of gui software that can do that], won't cli work better | 12:55 |
| lubot | <kc2bez> @HMollerCl [anyone here that uses KDE knows which app is the one that install privative driv …], They don't have a separate app, it is part of KCM or Kconfig Modules in system settings. | 13:05 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> KCM is the same as Kconfig? | 13:11 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @Wolfenprey talk me about kubuntu-driver-manager is not the same? | 13:12 |
| lubot | <kc2bez> `systemsettings5` is the application name. | 13:16 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @HMollerCl [anyone here that uses KDE knows which app is the one that install privative driv …], @acheronuk is the Kubuntu maintainer. :P | 13:30 |
| lubot | <teward001> @tsimonq2 just nagging as I normally do. so shush. also 90% of users dont read release notes this is confirmed | 13:45 |
| apt-ghetto | 98% don't encrypt | 13:46 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> @HMollerCl [anyone here that uses KDE knows which app is the one that install privative driv …], 'privative'? umm, you mean proprietary? | 13:55 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> https://cgit.kde.org/kubuntu-driver-kcm.git/ | 13:56 |
| lubot | <acheronuk> @kc2bez [They don't have a separate app, it is part of KCM or Kconfig Modules in system s …], Yeah, but it will also run seperatelt like most kcm modules outside systemsettings. e.g. envoke with kcmshell5 | 13:58 |
| lubot | <kc2bez> Good to know, thanks for the information. | 13:59 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @acheronuk ['privative'? umm, you mean proprietary?], Yes | 14:12 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> Thanks for the info | 14:13 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @teward001 [@tsimonq2 just nagging as I normally do. so shush. also 90% of users dont read …], Which is why we want a welcome center which shows them. :P | 14:23 |
| lubot | <aptghetto> The release notes that no one reads? | 14:24 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @aptghetto [The release notes that no one reads?], Yes. :P | 14:24 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> If they don't read the release notes they're missing out, but hey. | 14:25 |
| lubot | <aptghetto> Good, maybe with big blinking arrows around? | 14:25 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> 😆 | 14:25 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Did anyone update my push access? | 14:35 |
| lubot | <aptghetto> I have added the reviewers | 14:36 |
| lubot | <aptghetto> To your diff | 14:36 |
| lubot | <teward001> @tsimonq2 [Which is why we want a welcome center which shows them. :P], That only works after install, unless you force them to read release notes during the installer process. | 15:15 |
| lubot | <teward001> :P | 15:15 |
| lubot | <teward001> 'cause the encrypted partition breakage means they don't *see* a welcome center. | 15:15 |
| lubot | <brli7848> @teward001 [That only works after install, unless you force them to read release notes durin …], IMHO, one should always read, or at least, browse over the release note, before download the iso... | 15:54 |
| teward | @brli7848 I agree with you. However, users are typically lazy and won't read if they can avoid it. | 15:55 |
| teward | those of us in highly technical fields tend to but I also wanted the phab link. | 15:55 |
| teward | the problem is unless you FORCE users to read it... they won't. | 15:55 |
| teward | but thats its own can of worms right there | 15:55 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> How about a brief note aka an JavaScript alert when you click the iso download button with the release notes? | 16:39 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
