/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/07/15/#ubuntu-release.txt

=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
=== liushuyu1 is now known as liushuyu
=== liushuyu1 is now known as liushuyu
ricotzhello ubuntu-sru, please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/207305411:03
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2073054 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] libreoffice 24.2.5 for noble" [Medium, In Progress]11:03
=== sleeperb1 is now known as _sleeperbarbie
=== liushuyu1 is now known as liushuyu
georgiagrbasak: regarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072811 is there any way we can fix the apparmor regression instead of reverting the sru?12:44
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2072811 in apparmor (Ubuntu Noble) "Apparmor: New update broke flatpak with `apparmor='DENIED'`" [Critical, Triaged]12:44
waveformsil2100, was flash-kernel 3.107ubuntu9~24.04.1 rejected or not? I got a note about it (and yes, my fault that pipe snuck in there), but it's still showing up in the -proposed pocket? I can upload a fix with a .2 suffix but just wondered why the rejection appears not to have gone through?13:29
sil2100waveform: I reuploaded with the same version number13:30
sil2100Since until it's in -proposed, the version number doesn't matter13:30
waveformahhh, I see -- just noticed the upload time13:30
sil2100:)13:30
rbasakgeorgiag: I think the time for that is past, sorry. I'd have expected a fix to have been proposed already. The revert we can land within hours, as opposed to the time it would take considering what we need to fix about around testing first. Please do keep working on a fix though as we'll need to land that anyway!14:04
rbasaks/past/passed/14:05
=== liushuyu1 is now known as liushuyu
georgiagrbasak: thanks14:09
=== cplfidgvnekaibts is now known as papmqjazclroccek
=== papmqjazclroccek is now known as georgiag
=== dbungert1 is now known as dbungert

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!