[00:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) [00:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: speedtest-cli (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1 => 2.0.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [01:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) [05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libretls [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset) [05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libretls [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset) [05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libretls [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset) [05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libretls [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset) [05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libretls [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset) [05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libretls [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [3.4.1-2] (no packageset) [06:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libretls [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [3.4.1-2] [06:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libretls [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [3.4.1-2] [06:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libretls [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [3.4.1-2] [06:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libretls [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [3.4.1-2] [06:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libretls [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [3.4.1-2] [06:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libretls [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [3.4.1-2] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.7.2-3] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.7.2-3] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.5-1] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.5-1] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-semver-0.9 [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.9.0-2] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-semver-0.9 [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.9.0-2] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (jammy-proposed) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted taskd [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.7.2-3] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.5-1] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-semver-0.9 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.9.0-2] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted taskd [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted taskd [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.5-1] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted taskd [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.5-1] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] [06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted exhale [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.2.3-1] [06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.7.2-3] [06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.5-1] [06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-semver-0.9 [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.9.0-2] [06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted taskd [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] [06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.7.2-3] [06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-semver-0.9 [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.9.0-2] [06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted taskd [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] [06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.7.2-3] [06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-semver-0.9 [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.9.0-2] [08:14] Hi, is this an appropriate place to discuss/request a change in the development iso names from e.g. jammy-desktop-amd64.iso to e.g. ubuntu-mate-jammy-20211020-amd64.iso? [08:14] The main point is for the flavor to appear in the iso name, it will make it easier to test multiple flavors... [08:21] alkisg: I think I asked this question (or a similar one) a few months ago, and the answer was "it would be nice, but it'd break a lot of things" [08:23] schopin: thank you; well maybe if enough people would benefit from that, it would justify the required code changes to prevent breakage... [08:24] Maybe the core team only tests the gnome flavor and it's not tiring for them though [08:24] Agreed, however the problem in this sort of case isn't so much changing the code as identifying the code that needs changing. [08:25] On the plus side, it concerns a development release, its users aren't unfamiliar with temporary breakage... [08:26] So e.g. if the daily builds fail for a couple of days until all the code is fixed, I don't think it'll do a lot of harm [08:26] Especially if it's very early in the release cycle, e.g. in may for 22.10 [08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.4.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:16.4.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.2.2-0ubuntu1 => 2:21.2.3-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glance (focal-proposed/main) [2:20.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:20.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [08:28] Except that the code that does the daily builds is the same as the one doing the release builds, IIUC. So changing it could introduce breakage we wouldn't notice until the worst possible time : at release time. [08:28] I am guess the same code will also be generating the daily live ISOs for the LTS releases (e.g. focal) [08:29] e.g. http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/focal/daily-live/current/ [08:29] Hmm, I had no idea that daily isos were generated daily even for post-release lts releases! [08:30] OK, you guys know better, I expressed a minor annoyance, if it's hard to fix it of course we can live with it :) [08:30] Thank you! [08:31] maybe send to the release or devel mailing list, so people can see and ponder it if they like [08:32] 👍️ [08:34] alkisg: for the record I don't really know better, I just asked the very same question to people who do and kindly explained to me why it's complicated ;) [08:34] :) === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer [09:22] short maintenance on autopkgtest cloud incoming [09:33] everything looks good, rebuilding some jammy images on bos01 s390x and bos02 ppc64el [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-495 [source] (jammy-proposed) [495.44-0ubuntu1] [09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 [source] (focal-proposed) [470.82.00-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] [09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-495 [source] (focal-proposed) [495.44-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] [10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: corosync (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.3-0ubuntu1.2 => 2.4.3-0ubuntu1.3] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 [source] (hirsute-proposed) [470.82.00-0ubuntu0.21.04.1] [11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-495 [source] (hirsute-proposed) [495.44-0ubuntu0.21.04.1] [11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-495 [source] (bionic-proposed) [495.44-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] [11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 [source] (bionic-proposed) [470.82.00-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] [11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-495 [source] (impish-proposed) [495.44-0ubuntu0.21.10.1] [11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 [source] (impish-proposed) [470.82.00-0ubuntu0.21.10.1] [11:54] daily ubuntu ISO build failed again on a launchpad error, could we get jobs retried in such cases? [11:54] ideally launchpad would be reliable... [11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (hirsute-proposed/restricted) [470.74-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 => 470.82.00-0ubuntu0.21.04.1] (i386-whitelist) [11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (impish-proposed/restricted) [470.74-0ubuntu1 => 470.82.00-0ubuntu0.21.10.1] (i386-whitelist) [11:57] seb128: happy to retry them manually, not keen to do the work to implement automatic retrying since it's not far from that from automatic retries to having jobs that never finish and never notify us [11:58] (vs failing and getting a successful build the next day) [11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [470.74-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 470.82.00-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) [11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (focal-proposed/restricted) [470.74-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 470.82.00-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist) [11:58] (rerunning now)