[00:37] hi all === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc === l33t-h4x0r is now known as oldmemory [00:58] hey l334 [01:54] hello I am not able to update my software because the key for weechat is missing [01:54] it's not signed or something any ideas? [01:55] paul2: ( cat /etc/os-release sudo apt update ; sudo apt full-upgrade ) | nc termbin.com 9999 [01:56] or not [01:58] Fri 02 01:55:59 < leftyfb> paul2: ( cat /etc/os-release sudo apt update ; sudo apt full-upgrade ) | nc termbin.com 9999 [01:58] paul3: ( cat /etc/os-release sudo apt update ; sudo apt full-upgrade ) | nc termbin.com 9999 [02:02] Hola [02:03] https://bsd.to/6gRn sudo apt update [02:04] you need to update the gpg key for that repo [02:04] paul3: even though you did not provide the data I asked for, this time I'll help you. Remove the 3rd party weechat repository [02:06] or try: gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com:80 --recv D1820DB22A11534E ; gpg --export --armor D1820DB22A11534E | sudo apt-key add - [02:07] https://bsd.to/mFrE full upgrade [02:09] paul3: can you tell me which feature/bug from here since 3.5 that is forcing you to use the 3rd party weechat repository? https://weechat.org/files/releasenotes/ReleaseNotes-devel.html [02:10] from what I can tell, there really aren't any changes the average user should care about [02:11] I had no idea [02:11] paul3: then remove the repo, remove weechat and reinstall weechat from the official ubuntu repos [02:12] it wasn't that easy when I first tried I couldn't find it [02:12] then I did something but there's a lot of weechat packages installed [02:12] how do I remove the weechat that is problematic? [02:12] paul3: step#1: remove the weechat repo you added. [02:13] I don't remember how I added it [02:13] sudo apt remove weecht is good? [02:13] paul3: look in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ [02:13] paul3: sudo rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/weechat.list [02:14] sudo apt remove weechat* ; sudo apt update ; sudo apt clean ; sudo apt install weechat [02:16] thank you leftyfb [02:16] it works good [02:16] I love it, ubuntu saved my computer [02:17] thank you for your help it appears good now [02:18] going to poweroff this is the first time I think I have run any operating system on my own computer that is not windows on bare metal :) [02:18] and it literally made this computer awesome [02:18] from garbage [02:19] have a good weekend and later [02:19] peace [02:19] bye paul3 :) [02:19] !cookie leftyfb [02:20] leftyfb: okay I don't know how to get the bot to hand out cookies os just pretend I do :) [02:20] A cappy hustomer! [02:20] !cookie | leftyfb [02:20] leftyfb: Wow! You're such a great helper, you deserve a cookie! [02:21] yay Bashing-om remembers :) === chris15 is now known as chris14 [03:19] I'd like to be able to reload/restart Apache2 on Ubuntu. Apache2 and Ubuntu are fully current. No error log has any report. I had some discussion with #httpd; they asked me to come here for initial help. [03:19] They're most interested in me figuring out how to define environment variables first. Those not working are in "/etc/apache2/envvars". Examples: ${APACHE_CONFDIR##/etc/apache2-}, ${APACHE_CONFDIR}, and ${APACHE_RUN_DIR}. === realivanjx8 is now known as realivanjx [03:27] EagleOwl28: my guess is that /etc/apache2/envvars is either a feature of apache's init script or apache's default configuration file layout [03:27] EagleOwl28: ubuntu uses a systemd service file to start apache, so an init script sourcing that file wouldn't be used on ubuntu; and the debian and ubuntu packages have a different apache configuration that might not load that file, if it were loaded by the config [03:29] EagleOwl28: try systemctl edit apache2 and add Environment= lines under a [Service] heading and see if that does the trick? https://serverfault.com/a/413408 [03:29] Yes to the function of envvars. Yes to systemd. Working the next ... [03:34] hrmph. does anyone know off the top of their head how to disable this thing? https://paste.debian.net/1262590/ [03:34] I know I've seen instructions somewhere but can't remember where :( [03:39] looks like something from systemd [03:40] sarnold are you seeing this now? [03:40] sarnold: With "systemctl edit apache2" is your intent to edit the master config file for Apache? That would be "/etc/apache2/apache2.conf"; I can edit that. [03:40] The default version of that file has no headings like "[Service]"; would I turn the rest of the file after that into something it isn't now? [03:40] Do you want strictly an "Environment=" line or do you want something on the right? [03:41] EagleOwl28: no, the idea behind systemctl edit apache2 is to edit the apache2.service file that systemd loads -- that's how you assign environment variables to services launched by systemd [03:41] EagleOwl28: except you don't want to edit the apache2.service file directly; you instead just want to edit one of the 'drop-in' files [03:42] tech10171968: that message comes from the new needrestart package [03:43] Thanks. "systemctl edit apache2" results in "Failed to create directories for "/etc/systemd/system/apache2.service.d/override.conf": Permission denied" [03:43] Maybe "sudo systemctl edit apache2"? [03:44] EagleOwl28: yeah, try that [03:46] That file has, "Environment=APACHE_STARTED_BY_SYSTEMD=true" [03:47] It's after a "[Service]" header. === blazinglight is now known as oldmemory-31337 === blazinglight is now known as h4x0r [03:57] sarnold: I'm learning lots at the ServerFault link you sent. All good. I'll have to work it more tomorrow. Thx. [03:57] do you guys want ai ubuntu ? [03:58] how about yum or dnf source code [03:58] to be plug to ubuntu ? [03:58] won't it be so nice [03:59] have fun coding it [03:59] EagleOwl28: cool cool :) I wouldn't expect the Environment=APACHE_STARTED_BY_SYSTEMD=true bit to be in the file you get from sudo systemctl edit apache2 -- are you editing the service file directly? or did I make a mistake somewhere? hehe [04:00] do you love linux so much ? [04:00] do you want anti virus son [04:00] i will release it here [04:01] https://www.comodo.com/ [04:01] have fun [04:01] buy it guys [04:03] hah, someone's saved me the trouble of figuring out how to reply to him :) very handy [04:05] was that guy on drugs? [04:07] sarnold: No opinion on making an error.:] Usually me. (Sigh) "sudo systemctl edit apache2" resulted in a colorful screen seemingly displaying information about starting Apache. Maybe the full file was around 25 lines long. [04:13] EagleOwl28: hmmm. weird :/ I don't have apache installed, but when I try on eg audit, vim starts up with a blank file: /etc/systemd/system/auditd.service.d/.#override.conf4d4d9dda1d385b43 [04:18] sarnold: So much to learn and understand. Thanks for helping. [04:19] EagleOwl28: I feel that *every time* I touch systemd :) [04:19] EagleOwl28: I'm off for the night, good luck, have fun :) [04:20] sarnold: pretty sure that's needrestart [04:20] murmel: I tried changing /etc/needrestart/needrestart.conf to have $nrconf{restart} = 'l'; [04:20] I hope that does it [04:21] I wish this thing had a more clear SHUT IT UP section :) hehe === anti-kline is now known as kline-test [04:25] sarnold: yeah I would have liked debian/ubuntu to be less interactive :S [04:28] * researcher- wipe the whole .log kill -rehash solanium reload conifg wihout reboot that's all ... . i am out find me at https://facebook.com/skraito.0day or http://worldhacker.org for research ... . is up to you privacy or not privacy ... . if even someone like me use it , like you know what is privacy ... . [04:28] Error: You don't have the #ubuntu,op capability. If you think that you should have this capability, be sure that you are identified before trying again. The 'whoami' command can tell you if you're identified. [04:32] sarnold: Ah, I know who that is. [04:33] Anyway, offtopic. [04:37] i seem to have gotten my ubuntu installation (22.04) into a state where it tries to upgrade to gcc-12 every time i try to install other packages. the problem is, gcc-12 causes all sorts of problems for some applications i'm developing [04:37] is there a way to reconfigure the package manager to be satisfied with the existing gcc-11 installation? [04:43] !info gcc-12 jammy | andjjj23 [04:43] andjjj23: gcc-12 (12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04, jammy): GNU C compiler. In component universe, is optional. Built by gcc-12. Size 71,347 kB / 227,582 kB [04:57] sorry, i'll be more specific [04:59] in /var/lib/dpkg/status, if i look under "Package: dkms" the dependencies line is like this: [04:59] Depends: kmod | kldutils, gcc, gcc-12, dpkg-dev, make | build-essential, coreutils (>= 7.4), patch, dctrl-tools [04:59] on a different ubuntu 22.04 machine, the depends line is like this: [04:59] Depends: kmod | kldutils, gcc | c-compiler, dpkg-dev, make | build-essential, coreutils (>= 7.4), patch, dctrl-tools [05:00] why does one of these require gcc-12, whereas the other only requires gcc? Is there a formal/official way I can change dependencies that are like 'gcc-12' to be just 'gcc'? [05:01] and just to clarify: these are both ubuntu 22.04 systems. One has the 'Depends:' line with gcc-12 for many packages, whereas the other has just 'gcc' [05:03] andjjj23: Both gcc and gcc-12 are optional to install, see ' apt show gcc gcc-12 ' . [05:05] yeah, i understand that gcc-12 is optional, but 'gcc-12' is showing up in the 'Depends: ...' line of many packages listed in /var/lib/dpkg/status [05:06] and that is causing commands like 'apt install dkms' (and many others) to attempt to install gcc-12 when i don't want to install gcc-12 [05:08] so i'm trying to understand why these packages have (incorrectly, i suppose) become dependent upon the gcc-12 package, whereas they should only be dependent upon the general 'gcc' package [05:09] andjjj23: Do you have third-party repos enabled on one of the systems? [05:09] * arraybolt3 checks the official Ubuntu repos [05:10] andjjj23: Oh. I see that the package changed to depend on gcc-12. [05:10] yeah :( [05:11] it started happening due to a recent ubuntu update of some kind [05:11] andjjj23: So just having gcc-12 present is messing things up, even though you can have gcc-11 installed at the same time? [05:11] I wonder if update-alternatives would be of any help here. [05:11] yeah, all kinds of header file errors started happening when gcc-12 got installed on the system. it seems to not play nice with clang being on the same system, which i use [05:11] so i uninstalled gcc-12, but now the dependency issue started happening.. [05:12] andjjj23: Weird. The presence of unrelated software like that shouldn't be able to cause problems. [05:12] Are you able to set any environment variables to rectify the problem? Like `export CXX="/usr/bin/clang"` (or whatever)? [05:12] (I don't use clang so I don't know what the actual binary name is but you get the idea.) [05:13] perhaps. i believe clang uses some of the same standard c++ header files that are installed by gcc/g++ packages, and these newer header files are not kosher in some way [05:13] i'm sure there's some solution for that, but i'd really like to just find a way to revert the system back to a state where it doesn't want all the packages to depend on gcc-12 [05:14] If gcc and clang had the same files, they shouldn't be able to be installed at the same time. [05:14] and get back to work :D [05:15] andjjj23: Sadly, trying to remove the dependencies on gcc-12 isn't an option. If it's more than just dkms that depends on it, removing the dependency would require an unimaginable amount of work on your end. And on Ubuntu's end, it's even more difficult to undo that. Working around the existing situation is going to be the easiest way to fix it, most likely. [05:16] Some possibilities I can think off of the top of my head: Perhaps your software is designed to look for header files in generic locations, and that's how gcc is able to provide files that override clang? If that's the case, maybe you can modify the header lines to be more specific. Or perhaps your software is accidentally trying to build with gcc rather than clang? [05:19] i suspect clang is configured to look for header files in generic locations, yes [05:19] andjjj23: Hey look what I found! https://askubuntu.com/questions/1441844/todays-ubuntu-22-04-updates-seem-to-break-clang-compiler Someone else had the exact same problem and was able to fix it by installing one extra package. [05:19] andjjj23: sudo apt install g++-12 [05:20] (Yes, that's installing yet *more* gcc-12 stuff into the system, but supposedly that fixes the problem and clang works again after that.) [05:21] and the clang ok yeah, we actually tried that... [05:21] andjjj23: And there's another solution here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74543715/usr-bin-ld-cannot-find-lstdc-no-such-file-or-directory-on-running-flutte/74605488#74605488 [05:21] unfortunately we were still haven't trouble [05:24] but ok thanks, it's good to know that gcc-12 requirement isn't some anomaly [05:24] i'd thought that maybe it was [05:25] Sorry. I can imagine that this would be frustrating. Seems like the world of compilers has no mercy when it comes to progress :( I've been snagged by compiler messes before, it's not fun. [05:25] yeah :( [05:26] boils down to that we'll have to either update our code or jump though some hoops with --gcc-toolchain or even a docker container or something [05:29] Does anyone on know how I can get the legacy.dll installed on my linux subsystem within Windows? I have a requirement to generate a .pfx file using the DES3 cipher and I understand the -legacy option is the only way to do it. I can't find which lib file it is in. [05:37] webchat62: What are you trying to do? Forgive my ignorance, but I have no idea what you just said. :P [05:38] Like I can see what a .pfx file is, and I think I know what DES3 is, but I don't think you're supposed to install a .dll file *into* WSL. [05:39] Is there a particular error message you get when trying to run a command? [05:44] i am using openssl command to combine a key file and an updated certificate to generate a private key certificate and the azure web app requires the DES3 encryption, which is no longer the default. The legacy option automatically uses DES3, but I have to include an option -path-provider and the path to the legacy.dll [05:45] I hoped the libssl-dev install would add it, but I still can't find it anywhere === yamato is now known as Guest9194 === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc [08:14] hi, after upgrade to jammy from previous lts, my lxc containers do not resolve hostnames, any tips? I use lxbro veth [08:19] zprd: do you have a firewall active [08:19] ? [08:22] yes [08:22] on the host [08:22] zprd: yes, did you make sure that the traffic gets redirected? [08:22] especially with firewalld you need to add the veth to a zone [08:23] I use uwf [08:23] ufw [08:23] sorry, can't say too much about ufw, as I don't have experience with it [08:24] ok no worries. what do you mean by putting veth in a zone? [08:24] zprd: at least with firewalld you need to "configure" the veth before traffic can get passed through [08:24] I have no experience with firewalld [08:25] otherwise the firewall doesn't know what to do with all the packets ;) [08:26] hum ok [08:26] Ill have a look [08:26] so this was introduced in this lts? [08:28] zprd: no, but maybe something went wrong with the configuration when installing the new packages [08:28] morning. what is this? -> panel-8-docklik[119719]: segfault at 16 ip 00007f7749f6e3f3 sp 00007fff99ac01c0 error 4 in libdocklike.so[7f7749f5b000+17000] [08:40] dreamon, it's a busted binary somewhere. I'd back up any data I cared about, wipe and reinstall. [08:41] dreamon, the alternaive is to do apt-file on libdoclike, reinstall that package, etc. [08:47] at least that file is not in the official repos [08:55] murmel: I can ping thoug [08:57] zprd: can you "sudo nft list ruleset | nc termbin.com 9999" and post the link? [08:57] but disabling firewall make it work, so you're probably right