| tsimonq2 | nacc: *takes this here* so I've been told upload NOTHING during freezes (prospective MOTU :P), is it an exception if seeded-in-ubuntu doesn't find anything, or do I still just not upload? | 00:18 |
|---|---|---|
| teward | tsimonq2: FFe policies | 00:18 |
| tsimonq2 | teward: Which I'm asking about. | 00:19 |
| teward | exceptions are security issues, bugfix-only, no version bumps. | 00:19 |
| teward | FFe process: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess | FeatureFreeze details: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureFreeze | 00:19 |
| nacc | tsimonq2: it does depend on which freeze you mean | 00:19 |
| teward | tsimonq2: FeatureFreeze, it needs approval by the release team I think it is to 'accept new features for a package. | 00:19 |
| teward | final freeze is ***really*** really restrictive | 00:20 |
| teward | and usually nothing is touched then | 00:20 |
| tsimonq2 | Confused after RTFMing: seeded-in-ubuntu - Determine whether a package is safe to upload during a freeze | 00:20 |
| teward | tsimonq2: depending on *which* freeze, depends on the true answer | 00:20 |
| teward | on Thurs, I think, we start FeatureFreeze | 00:20 |
| teward | and FFe policies go into effect | 00:20 |
| nacc | tsimonq2: yeah, i think that manpage probably needs an update too :) | 00:20 |
| teward | ^ this | 00:21 |
| teward | tsimonq2: #ubuntu-motu would also be a valid place to ask this, though it's far less active | 00:21 |
| tsimonq2 | teward: Ok, yeah, I thought this seemed like a releasey question :P | 00:21 |
| teward | tsimonq2: well, true, but still | 00:21 |
| * teward is more concerned about Perl holding **everything** up | 00:22 | |
| === santa is now known as Guest16956 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flatpak [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.8.2-1~ubuntu16.10.1] | 00:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ostree [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2016.15-2ubuntu1~ubuntu16.10.1] | 00:41 | |
| === Guest3904 is now known as medberry | ||
| === medberry is now known as med_ | ||
| === tgm4883_ is now known as tgm4883 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtk+3.0 [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.9-1ubuntu3.2] | 00:48 | |
| jbicha | RAOF: are you willing to accept bubblewrap, ostree and flatpak as new packages into xenial too? | 00:59 |
| RAOF1 | jbicha: I'm not able to do that, sorry. Need a fully-fledged AA to do NEW. | 01:01 |
| jbicha | who are the real AAs then? https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+members | 01:04 |
| RAOF1 | Both slangasek and infinity are real AAs and have been recently active :) | 01:07 |
| * RAOF1 really should get to fully-fledged AA. | 01:08 | |
| slangasek | jbicha: what's the rationale for these as new SRUs in xenial? | 01:12 |
| jbicha | slangasek: it's basically the same rationale as snap in trusty: it's a way to get new apps on a stable release | 01:20 |
| jbicha | I'm trying to SRU chrome-gnome-shell too, for trusty and xenial bug 1652537 | 01:29 |
| ubot5 | bug 1652537 in chrome-gnome-shell (Ubuntu Xenial) "Update chrome-gnome-shell to version 8 in all supported releases" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1652537 | 01:29 |
| slangasek | jbicha: ok, but snapd is part of the core Ubuntu platform in xenial and later; providing consistency with that would seem to have a bit more value in an SRU than $arbitrary_app_store? | 01:33 |
| jbicha | slangasek: Ubuntu GNOME 17.04 includes flatpak now | 01:35 |
| slangasek | jbicha: and are there things you currently go through cumbersome SRUs of that you would propose to provide instead via flatpak? | 01:36 |
| mdeslaur | rbasak, nacc: thanks! | 01:37 |
| slangasek | SRUing of snapd into trusty is a win because it means we can reduce the number of process-heavy SRU exceptions | 01:37 |
| jbicha | The Flatpak maintainer asked if I could get flatpak into Ubuntu 16.04 LTS as they would like Flatpak 0.8 to be available in all LTS distros | 01:38 |
| jbicha | currently, they are recommending xenial users use a PPA to get flatpak: http://flatpak.org/getting.html | 01:38 |
| jbicha | honestly, I don't really use snap or flatpak; the target audience isn't someone who runs the Ubuntu development release | 01:43 |
| jbicha | many GNOME apps are available via flatpak but I don't think are in the snap store yet and obviously the latest stable GNOME is not going to be SRU'd to xenial | 01:43 |
| slangasek | jbicha: right. I don't think I see any reason that this should be disallowed in xenial, but I also don't see any reason to prioritize it relative to SRUs of existing packages | 01:48 |
| jbicha | sure, I can wait | 01:49 |
| jbicha | I've been working on it since December but 2 bubblewrap security bugs had to be fixed in yakkety first | 01:50 |
| jbicha | how about chrome-gnome-shell, which should be in -updates before Firefox 52 gets there next month? | 01:50 |
| slangasek | jbicha: I don't understand, what's the relationship between those two things? | 01:53 |
| jbicha | because Firefox 52 drops support for browser plugins so this is the workaround | 01:58 |
| jbicha | the package name is unfortunate but it implement the chrome webextension api and was originally for chrome/chromium | 01:58 |
| slangasek | jbicha: so what existing functionality is this replacing that will regress when firefox 52 drops? | 02:02 |
| jbicha | does bug 1652537 answer your question? | 02:04 |
| ubot5 | bug 1652537 in chrome-gnome-shell (Ubuntu Xenial) "Update chrome-gnome-shell to version 8 in all supported releases" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1652537 | 02:04 |
| slangasek | jbicha: got it, thanks | 02:05 |
| powersj | /quit | 02:22 |
| powersj | woops :P | 02:22 |
| === eylul- is now known as eylul | ||
| === tumbleweed_ is now known as tumbleweed | ||
| === andyrock_ is now known as andyrock | ||
| === nottrobin_ is now known as nottrobin | ||
| === WillMoogle_ is now known as WillMoogle | ||
| ginggs | apw: please check rev 2195 in your hints file, should be armhf ther instead of s390x | 06:12 |
| apw | ginggs, bah fixed | 06:26 |
| ginggs | apw: thanks | 06:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lorene [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 07:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lorene [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 08:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lorene [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 08:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lorene [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 08:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lorene [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 08:16 | |
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-scrapy-djangoitem [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.1-1] | 08:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lorene [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 08:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lorene [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 08:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lorene [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 08:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lorene [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 08:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lorene [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.0~cvs20161116+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 08:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted budgie-wallpapers [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [17.04] | 08:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.9-5ubuntu0.3 => 1:1.5.9-5ubuntu0.4] (core) | 10:10 | |
| === caribou_ is now known as caribou | ||
| === enyc_ is now known as enic | ||
| === enic is now known as enyc | ||
| === marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson | ||
| === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [arm64] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 11:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [i386] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 11:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [armhf] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 11:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 11:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: npd6 [s390x] (zesty-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 11:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 11:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted makedumpfile [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.9-5ubuntu0.4] | 11:21 | |
| Odd_Bloke | slangasek: I've updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gce-compute-image-packages/+bug/1662491 to add a test for the other udev rule. | 11:24 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1662491 in gce-compute-image-packages (Ubuntu Yakkety) "gce-compute-image-packages dropped udev rules that were present in gce-utils" [Undecided,New] | 11:24 |
| Odd_Bloke | Which happens to be most of a fix for another issue GCE have filed. \o/ | 11:24 |
| Odd_Bloke | slangasek: Hmm, actually, the rest of the fix is just dropping a file in /etc/rsyslog.d, so I think it's probably worth doing that as part of this SRU rather than having to do all the busywork again. | 11:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] | 11:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] | 11:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] | 11:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] | 11:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] | 11:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] | 11:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted npd6 [i386] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1] | 11:31 | |
| === sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
| Laney | were .manifest files always served up as application/x-ms-manifest? | 11:35 |
| Trevinho | hi rbasak, can you please unqueue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libappindicator ? | 11:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-ews [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.5-1ubuntu1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-ews [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.22.3-0ubuntu1] | 11:44 | |
| Laney | am I going mad? | 11:49 |
| Laney | It looks like unity8 isn't installable in zesty | 11:49 |
| Laney | can someone confirm? | 11:49 |
| apw | Laney, i have it installed, if that counts any | 11:54 |
| Laney | apw: Probably a component-mismatch | 11:55 |
| Laney | Although | 11:56 |
| apw | oh that likely | 11:56 |
| apw | though if you mean in -proposed, then ... i am not helping :) | 11:57 |
| Laney | wtf | 11:57 |
| Laney | apw: Do you have the newest version? | 11:58 |
| apw | Laney, from zesty-release yes | 11:58 |
| Odd_Bloke | Same here. | 11:58 |
| apw | unity8 is already the newest version (8.15+17.04.20170206-0ubuntu1). | 11:58 |
| Laney | As far as I can see unity8-common has Depends: unity-application-impl-26 which doesn't exist | 11:59 |
| Laney | Oh, unity8-tests in zesty/universe | 12:00 |
| Laney | eww | 12:00 |
| apw | oh did something move from main to universe while installed on your box perhaps | 12:01 |
| jbicha | Laney: bug 1662608 and https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/02/07/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t16:45 :) | 12:02 |
| ubot5 | bug 1662608 in qtmir (Ubuntu) "unity8 should not depend on unity8-tests" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1662608 | 12:02 |
| Laney | Right, but I didn't link that to a component mismatch | 12:02 |
| apw | Laney, hehe that was you :) | 12:03 |
| apw | quite how it got out of -proposed with that though | 12:03 |
| Laney | at a guess, the thing doesn't deal with provides | 12:06 |
| infinity | How is that bug still in the archive? :/ | 12:11 |
| infinity | I've been avoiding upgrading to not pull all that crap in. | 12:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (xenial-proposed/main) [229-4ubuntu16 => 229-4ubuntu17] (core) | 12:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu17] | 12:12 | |
| infinity | Laney: Can you escalate and/or jfdi a fix for that bug? Pulling in the whole X dev stack on upgrade is unpleasant, to say the least. | 12:14 |
| infinity | Oh, I see an MP from a week ago. | 12:14 |
| infinity | FFS. | 12:14 |
| Laney | I'm asking in #-ci-eng | 12:14 |
| jbicha | I set apt-mark hold on the unity8 tests because I didn't want that -dev stuff either :) | 12:18 |
| infinity | I've just been upgrading instead of dist-upgrading for now. | 12:19 |
| Laney | So it should be within a day, if this all-proposed run makes their tests go green | 12:19 |
| Laney | There are lots of other fixes bundled up with the one we want | 12:20 |
| Laney | The usual thing... | 12:20 |
| apw | won't it autoremove off again when the bits are fixed ? | 12:23 |
| infinity | In theory. | 12:26 |
| Laney | I don't know | 12:27 |
| infinity | Actually, no. | 12:27 |
| Laney | Will you be moved from one provider to another? | 12:27 |
| infinity | It won't. | 12:27 |
| Laney | I don't see how | 12:27 |
| infinity | Yeah, that. | 12:27 |
| apw | hrm, why so, that seems counter-intuitive | 12:27 |
| infinity | apw: It's not that it had a spurious dependency on foo-tests, it's that foo-tests and qtmir-thing both provide virtual-$version, but $version was wrong on qtmir. | 12:27 |
| infinity | apw: So, you got foo-tests instead. When qtmir is fixed, foo-tests will stick around because it still satisfies the dep. | 12:28 |
| Laney | MMMmmmmmmmmmm | 12:30 |
| Laney | So there's a libmirplatform transition | 12:30 |
| Laney | qtmir -> miral -> libmirplatform | 12:30 |
| jbicha | bump the depends/provides to impl-27? | 12:30 |
| Laney | and miral FTBFS with a no-change rebuild against this new one | 12:30 |
| Laney | There's a new upstream release which works apparently | 12:30 |
| infinity | jbicha: Still wouldn't autoremove, it'd just upgrade unity8-tests to the one that provides the new virtual. :P | 12:32 |
| apw | crap, and my machine is already infected with this mess | 12:33 |
| apw | ii unity8-tests:amd64 | 12:33 |
| jbicha | drop the unity8-tests package and create a new unity8-tests-oops-our-bad package ;) | 12:33 |
| apw | so once i get a fixed unity (and a couple of pints of beer in compensation) i assume i can purge that one | 12:33 |
| infinity | apw: Yeah, manually removing unity8-tests should autoremove all the rest of the junk at least. | 12:39 |
| infinity | Manually removing it right now would also do very little harm, except for the bit where we have it in the desktop seed. | 12:39 |
| Laney | Saviq is OKing me just uploading a Provides switch | 12:40 |
| infinity | Which we never should have, IMO. Should have been a separate meta, so people could whack it without consequence. | 12:40 |
| infinity | Laney: Say, why didn't we do that? | 12:40 |
| infinity | Wait... | 12:41 |
| infinity | Removing unity8 doesn't remove ubuntu-desktop. | 12:41 |
| infinity | I could have sworn it was in the desktop seed. | 12:41 |
| Laney | Recommends | 12:41 |
| infinity | Ahh. | 12:41 |
| infinity | Well, that's my solution then. | 12:42 |
| infinity | I was "dogfooding" it, but it's not like it's actually useful enough for me to do so. | 12:42 |
| * Laney LA LA LAs at the lintian errors in qtmir | 12:44 | |
| * infinity purges libhybris too, to see what that takes with it. | 12:44 | |
| Laney | there we go | 12:48 |
| Laney | I think this will not get involved with the mirplatform transition | 12:49 |
| === coreycb` is now known as coreycb | ||
| Odd_Bloke | So what's the solution to get rid of unity8-tests? Can I just remove it now? | 13:10 |
| Laney | If you wait for qtmir to migrate, then apt should offer to install (or upgrade) it when you try to remove unity8-tests | 13:12 |
| Odd_Bloke | Right, whereas removing it now removes all of unity8. | 13:13 |
| Odd_Bloke | OK, I shall wait. | 13:13 |
| Saviq | Laney, btw, can you please upload the same change to xenial overlay? | 13:13 |
| Laney | Saviq: sure, if that's allowed | 13:15 |
| Saviq | Laney, yeah, it is | 13:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.3 (trusty-proposed/main) [9.3.15-0ubuntu0.14.04 => 9.3.16-0ubuntu0.14.04] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postgresql-9.3 [sync] (trusty-proposed) [9.3.16-0ubuntu0.14.04] | 13:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.5 (xenial-proposed/main) [9.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04 => 9.5.6-0ubuntu0.16.04] (core) (sync) | 13:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postgresql-9.5 (yakkety-proposed/main) [9.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.10 => 9.5.6-0ubuntu0.16.10] (core) (sync) | 13:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postgresql-9.5 [sync] (xenial-proposed) [9.5.6-0ubuntu0.16.04] | 13:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postgresql-9.5 [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [9.5.6-0ubuntu0.16.10] | 13:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-8.10] (core, kernel) | 14:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu17] | 14:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nano [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.5.3-2ubuntu2] | 14:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.9] | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:2.6.1+dfsg-0ubuntu5.3] | 14:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted multipath-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5ubuntu2.4] | 14:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted multipath-tools [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5ubuntu7.2] | 14:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libodb [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.4.0-1build0~16.04.1] | 14:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libodb [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.4.0-1build0~16.10.1] | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20160930-0ubuntu3~16.10.0 => 20160930-0ubuntu5~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20160930-0ubuntu3~16.04.0 => 20160930-0ubuntu5~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 14:48 | |
| Odd_Bloke | If anyone has a moment, they could reject gce-compute-image-packages 20160930-0ubuntu4~16.10.0 from the yakkety queue and 20160930-0ubuntu3~16.04.1 from the xenial queue. | 14:48 |
| Odd_Bloke | slangasek: And these are the new gce-compute-image-packages ^ | 14:50 |
| arges | Odd_Bloke: sure | 14:50 |
| arges | Odd_Bloke: does that look correct now? | 14:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu3~16.04.1] | 14:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (yakkety-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu4~16.10.0] | 14:52 | |
| Odd_Bloke | arges: Yep, thanks! | 14:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libappindicator (xenial-proposed/main) [12.10.1+15.04.20141110-0ubuntu1 => 12.10.1+16.04.20170215-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 15:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-8.10] | 15:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: blktap-dkms (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.0.93-0.5ubuntu1 => 2.0.93-0.7ubuntu2~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: broadcom-sta (xenial-proposed/multiverse) [6.30.223.271-2 => 6.30.223.271-3~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:32 | |
| jgrimm | arges, would you be able to process curtin from Xenial today? | 15:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dm-writeboost (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.1.1-1 => 2.1.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dm-writeboost [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu1] | 15:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.7.1-1 => 2.8.0-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oss4 (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.2-build2010-5 => 4.2-build2010-5ubuntu1~14.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted oss4 [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.2-build2010-5ubuntu1~14.04.1] | 16:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xtables-addons (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.10-1build1 => 2.10-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 16:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lttng-modules [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.8.0-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] | 16:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blktap-dkms [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.93-0.7ubuntu2~16.04.1] | 16:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted broadcom-sta [source] (xenial-proposed) [6.30.223.271-3~16.04.1] | 16:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xtables-addons [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.10-1ubuntu0.1] | 16:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 16:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libodb-boost (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-1build0~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libodb-boost (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-1build0~16.10.1] (no packageset) | 16:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [i386] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 16:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [s390x] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 16:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [powerpc] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 16:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [arm64] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 16:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [armhf] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 16:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nginx [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 16:55 | |
| teward | yes, unfortunately, package structure for nginx changed thanks to Debian and Dynamic Modules >.> | 16:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.14+16.10ubuntu2 => 0.15+16.10ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.14+16.04ubuntu2 => 0.15+16.04ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:04 | |
| === Eliz is now known as Elizabeth | ||
| dmj_s76 | infinity: No new iso this morning? | 17:44 |
| infinity | dmj_s76: Very shortly. Just testing a build now. | 17:44 |
| infinity | Or, rather, it's building so I can test it. | 17:44 |
| dmj_s76 | infinity: oh, great...we're eagerly waiting to test :) | 17:44 |
| Odd_Bloke | slangasek: I'm EOD now; it would be lovely to wake up to gce-compute-image-packages packages in -proposed. ^_^ | 18:09 |
| slangasek | Odd_Bloke: .changes file ended up with no bug references; having a look at this, probably just a no-change reupload from me | 18:31 |
| === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20160930-0ubuntu3~16.10.0 => 20160930-0ubuntu5~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 19:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (yakkety-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu5~16.10.0] | 19:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (yakkety-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu5~16.10.0] | 19:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu5~16.04.0] | 20:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20160930-0ubuntu3~16.04.0 => 20160930-0ubuntu5~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20160930-0ubuntu5~16.04.0] | 20:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base powerpc [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (precise-proposed/partner) [1:20170110.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 => 1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1] (no packageset) | 20:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20170110.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) | 20:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20170110.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset) | 20:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (yakkety-proposed/partner) [1:20170110.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] (no packageset) | 20:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] | 20:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] | 20:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 20:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (precise-proposed) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1] | 20:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 20:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 21:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 21:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] (20170215.8) has been added | 21:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Xenial 16.04.2] (20170215.8) has been added | 21:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] (20170215.8) has been added | 21:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server powerpc [Xenial 16.04.2] (20170215.8) has been added | 21:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.2] (20170215.8) has been added | 21:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Mythbuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 21:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Mythbuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 21:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 21:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 21:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 21:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 21:33 | |
| === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 21:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215) | 21:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215.2) | 21:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.2] has been updated (20170215.2) | 21:49 | |
| wxl | infinity: what's new with the ISO? | 22:33 |
| tsimonq2 | wxl: I thought HWE stuff but I could be wrong | 22:46 |
| wxl | tsimonq2: yeah well knowing that is always helpful XD | 22:51 |
| wxl | if that's all it is, we'll mostly look at smoke testing | 22:51 |
| tsimonq2 | wxl: I could have sworn there was a way we can just diff the freaking ISOs! | 22:52 |
| wxl | tsimonq2: well you could grab the manifest and diff them for sure | 22:52 |
| wxl | maybe i'll just do that. sigh. :) | 22:52 |
| wxl | of course the old manifest is overwritten :/ | 22:54 |
| wxl | and all the flavours have already built soooooo | 22:54 |
| * tsimonq2 changes wxl's locale back to en_US from en_GB | 22:55 | |
| tsimonq2 | :P | 22:55 |
| wxl | no way man i use en_CA XD | 22:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ht-el [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [2.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:11 | |
| tsimonq2 | wxl: Aw what really? :P | 23:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: py-isort-el [amd64] (zesty-proposed/none) [2016.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:13 | |
| slangasek | the manifest for the previous image would still be under the previous build serial | 23:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: proftpd-dfsg (trusty-proposed/universe) [1.3.5~rc3-2.1ubuntu2.1 => 1.3.5~rc3-2.1ubuntu2.2] (no packageset) | 23:15 | |
| slangasek | for images where the old one rotated off, well, not so much | 23:15 |
| wxl | tsimonq2: no. :) | 23:19 |
| tsimonq2 | wxl: Good. :P | 23:20 |
| wxl | slangasek: yeah it's weird cuz when i looked this morning there was both 20170209 and 20170208 but now there's just one. | 23:21 |
| slangasek | yes, they're expired based on age | 23:21 |
| wxl | booo | 23:21 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Where's the tooling that builds the images again? | 23:21 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: which piece? lp:ubuntu-cdimage? | 23:22 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: I mean the thing that builds the dailies. | 23:22 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Like, installs the packages and such. | 23:22 |
| slangasek | do you mean lp:livecd-rootfs? | 23:23 |
| tsimonq2 | Maaaybe... | 23:23 |
| * tsimonq2 checks | 23:23 | |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Hm so it doesn't LOOK like it. Maybe I'm not looking right? | 23:25 |
| slangasek | well, I'm not sure which piece you're looking for | 23:26 |
| wxl | hold on | 23:26 |
| wxl | i think i can answer this | 23:26 |
| tsimonq2 | wxl: Yes siree please do :) | 23:26 |
| slangasek | the chain is ubuntu-cdimage -> (launchpad-buildd -> livecd-rootfs -> live-build), debian-cd | 23:26 |
| tsimonq2 | Ooh, mkay. | 23:27 |
| wxl | yeah that's what i was going to say based on the crontab | 23:27 |
| === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
| === mwhudson is now known as Guest32650 | ||
| === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!