| Eickmeyer | tomreyn, krytarik: Just looking at the logs, I saw about 2-3 different violations by Hash. Basically being disruptive and disrespectful, which I'd consider a CoC violation, and repeatedly going off-topic. | 18:45 |
|---|---|---|
| teward | Eickmeyer: mind sharing with me? | 18:46 |
| teward | because i'm curious | 18:46 |
| tomreyn | they've shown a rough edge in the past | 18:46 |
| Eickmeyer | teward: Sure, my logs were local, but I'll get you something. | 18:46 |
| teward | Eickmeyer: find the same logs on the irc logs page, problem solved. | 18:46 |
| teward | :P | 18:46 |
| Eickmeyer | teward: Exactly, but ERR:TakesAMoment | 18:47 |
| tomreyn | normally you can just do https://ubuntu.com/search?q=hash but this is a difficult nickname | 18:47 |
| tomreyn | works well for this repeat offender https://ubuntu.com/search?q=tomreyn | 18:48 |
| Eickmeyer | teward: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/02/21/%23ubuntu.html search for Hash as a nick. | 18:48 |
| Eickmeyer | That's only yesterday. | 18:49 |
| Eickmeyer | Basically, if it were me, one more violation by this person and that's grounds for a ban. | 18:49 |
| Eickmeyer | Especially since they've been warned multiple times. | 18:49 |
| teward | my 2 cents | 18:54 |
| teward | yes they should be smacked for the violations of CoC | 18:54 |
| teward | but at the same time they WERE attempting to help | 18:54 |
| teward | so I'd say a quiet not a ban | 18:54 |
| teward | if only because bans are... well, more 'final' | 18:54 |
| teward | this IS, however, an IRCC / IRC Moderator level decision ;) | 18:54 |
| teward | (not CC) | 18:54 |
| teward | (just making a point of WHY we have delegated permissions :)_ | 18:55 |
| el | have they been talked to about it yet? | 18:57 |
| Eickmeyer | el: In channel. | 18:57 |
| Eickmeyer | teward: I agree, I was just making friendly suggestions. :) | 18:57 |
| el | hrm istr hash being someone specific too | 18:57 |
| el | let me look a bit | 18:58 |
| * Eickmeyer has his friendly IRC OP hat on, not his CC hat, to be clear | 18:58 | |
| el | oh. right. it's Stoned | 19:00 |
| Eickmeyer | el: Oh! Isn't that an evasion then? | 19:00 |
| el | idk are they curently in the ban list? | 19:00 |
| Eickmeyer | idk... | 19:00 |
| Eickmeyer | Stoned has definitely been warned several times in several different channels. | 19:01 |
| Eickmeyer | iirc | 19:01 |
| el | doesn't seem they have an account ban in #ubuntu unless there's an interim nick i forgot about | 19:01 |
| Eickmeyer | Well, if it's Stoned and they changed their nick, then they definitely either a) know better, or b) have been told. | 19:02 |
| el | he is banned from -ot though | 19:02 |
| Eickmeyer | ^ That | 19:02 |
| Eickmeyer | 's right. | 19:02 |
| el | so yeah he's not goign to change. i'd just go for removal the next time they dumb | 19:02 |
| Eickmeyer | Exactly what I was suggesting. | 19:02 |
| Eickmeyer | I knew that MO looked familiar. | 19:03 |
| el | previously chown and chmod in #ubuntu-offtopic | 19:04 |
| Eickmeyer | Pattern of poor behavior. | 19:05 |
| hggdh | for the record, I have quieted Apachez (but ubottu did not ask me for reasons) | 20:23 |
| hggdh | ugh. Incomplete record -- they were quieted in #u | 20:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!