| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: secure-delete (impish-proposed/universe) [3.1-6ubuntu2 => 3.1-7] (no packageset) (sync) | 01:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted secure-delete [sync] (impish-proposed) [3.1-7] | 01:42 | |
| bdmurray | There'll be a rebuild of images which use linux-raspi in a bit | 01:48 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | slyon: WRT systemd in Focal phased-updater whitelisting - do we know if the new, less frequent crashes are hitting the same set of people? | 03:20 |
| RAOF | Because if they're hitting different people then fewer crashes is a less-clear win. | 03:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 03:51 | |
| bdmurray | I've started the respin of raspi images | 04:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 04:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 04:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 04:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 06:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 06:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 06:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 06:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 06:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 06:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mame (impish-proposed/universe) [0.235+dfsg.1-1 => 0.235+dfsg.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mame [source] (impish-proposed) [0.235+dfsg.1-1ubuntu1] | 06:50 | |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, hey there, so the current impish iso has firefox as a snap and a deb, we probably need ubuntu-desktop source uploaded for the deb removal to be active? | 07:21 |
| oSoMoN | seb128, right, I can take care of that | 07:22 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, thanks! I mentioned it on ~Desktop yesterday but I was unsure if that was something bdmurray was handling or he spoke just of the supported seeds changes | 07:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ms-gsl (impish-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-4ubuntu2 => 3.1.0-4ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 07:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ms-gsl [source] (impish-proposed) [3.1.0-4ubuntu3] | 07:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (impish-proposed/universe) [0.13.02-1 => 0.13.03-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 07:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.13.03-1] | 07:41 | |
| juergh | bjf, ack. looking. | 07:58 |
| oSoMoN | seb128, just to make sure, the ubuntu-meta update is something we want in the beta, so it's okay to upload now, right? | 09:15 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, yes | 09:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (impish-proposed/main) [1.471 => 1.472] (core) | 09:23 | |
| oSoMoN | seb128, ^ | 09:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zoneminder (impish-proposed/universe) [1.36.5+dfsg1-1ubuntu1 => 1.36.7+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 09:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ivar (impish-proposed/universe) [1.3.1+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 1.3.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 09:35 | |
| seb128 | ubuntu release members, could you review ^ for beta, without it the desktop ISO includes firefox as a deb which we don't want anymore | 09:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ivar [sync] (impish-proposed) [1.3.1+dfsg-2] | 09:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zoneminder [sync] (impish-proposed) [1.36.7+dfsg1-1] | 09:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nodejs (impish-proposed/universe) [12.22.5~dfsg-2ubuntu2 => 12.22.5~dfsg-5ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 09:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings (impish-proposed/main) [21.10.3 => 21.10.4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 09:43 | |
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyroute2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.21-0.1ubuntu2.1] | 11:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blueman [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.2-1ubuntu0.3] | 11:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ivar (impish-proposed/universe) [1.3.1+dfsg-2 => 1.3.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:35 | |
| === locutusofborg_ is now known as locutusofborg | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ivar [source] (impish-proposed) [1.3.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tigervnc [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.11.0+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1] | 11:50 | |
| bdmurray | oSoMoN: can you tell me about the language-selector move? | 14:02 |
| bdmurray | oSoMoN: also the Firefox snap doesn't seem to be available for every architecture https://snapcraft.io/firefox | 14:05 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, we only build desktop ISOs for amd64 and amd64 no? | 14:08 |
| oSoMoN | bdmurray, I assumed the language-selector move was a previous seed change that hadn't been followed by an ubuntu-meta update, but now I'm not seeing the corresponding changes in the seed, so I'm confused, it looks like I might have messed up | 14:09 |
| bdmurray | seb128: that's a good point | 14:10 |
| seb128 | arm64* | 14:11 |
| seb128 | unsure why we have language selector change in there either :-/ | 14:12 |
| bdmurray | Ah I see now | 14:14 |
| bdmurray | https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/+merge/408418 | 14:14 |
| oSoMoN | ah, I wasn't looking at the correct seed… | 14:17 |
| oSoMoN | so I didn't mess up after all | 14:17 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, do you have an idea why the recent builds from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/impish/ubuntu-canary are from the primary archive rather than the canary one? | 14:20 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, it's resulting in non working ISO for our new installer | 14:20 |
| seb128 | since we have some overrides we need in the ppa for the installer to work properly | 14:21 |
| bdmurray | I don't have an immediate answer but will look after finishing ubuntu-meta | 14:21 |
| bdmurray | I guess you want ubuntu-settings in too since we are doing a respin? | 14:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (impish-proposed) [1.472] | 14:23 | |
| bdmurray | oSoMoN, seb128 ^ | 14:24 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, yes | 14:24 |
| seb128 | it's changing the launcher config to include the firefox entry rather than the deb | 14:25 |
| seb128 | +snap | 14:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-settings [source] (impish-proposed) [21.10.4] | 14:25 | |
| slyon | ping ubuntu-release, could someone please whitelist systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.13 (focal) in the phased-updater? The rational goes here: https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/408816/comments/1079349 | 14:29 |
| slyon | summary: we have a new crash report (replacing an old one) stopping the phased updates. With the old crash not happening anymore and the new crash happening less frequent, so it's an improvement overall. | 14:29 |
| bdmurray | slyon: I think RAOF had a question about that | 14:29 |
| bdmurray | https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/09/22/%23ubuntu-release.html | 14:29 |
| bdmurray | seb128: so the ubuntu-canary project isn't part of the beta and should continue to be built daily. Is that correct? | 14:36 |
| bdmurray | slyon: also its ubuntu-sru who can override a package phasing issue | 14:41 |
| slyon | bdmurray: thanks! I must have missed that. | 14:42 |
| slyon | I will get back to him ten | 14:42 |
| slyon | then* | 14:42 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, yes | 14:53 |
| bdmurray | seb128: okay, do you want a manual build of it now or would tomorrow's daily be fine? | 14:55 |
| bdmurray | I'll just build it now | 14:57 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, now would be nicer if that's not much work for you | 14:57 |
| seb128 | thx | 14:57 |
| ginggs | would someone please review https://code.launchpad.net/~ginggs/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/408934 ? | 15:03 |
| ginggs | i'm hoping to include that in my +1 report :) | 15:03 |
| falcojr | bdmurray: for the queued cloud-init uploads, is that something you were still looking at, or is new day new vanguard so rbasak should look at it? | 15:14 |
| bdmurray | falcojr: I'm a bit busy with the beta so if rbasak could do that would help otherwise I might have some time in a couple of hours | 15:15 |
| slyon | RAOF: wrt. the systemd focal SRU phased-updater whitelisting: Yes, there is evidence that it does hit the same set of people. I did a spot check on the SystemIdentifiers on errors.ubuntu.com that reported the new crash and found that many of them also reported the old systemd crash in the past, e.g.: | 15:20 |
| slyon | https://errors.ubuntu.com/user/9d2af7e481319e1328dfe0a2230cdfbb0dbb1d6d80a54d69fa4de8c24a844e6aff7119ce83ef0591a956231f5ceaa06c1fe064adefb60aa3701d28caa5f46cb5 (1st vs 3rd systemd crash) | 15:20 |
| bdmurray | There'll be rebuilds of Ubuntu Desktop amd64 and Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi today | 15:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 15:39 | |
| bdmurray | ginggs: merged | 15:39 |
| ginggs | bdmurray: thanks! | 15:40 |
| tseliot | bdmurray, hey, did you get my message about ubuntu-drivers-common? | 15:44 |
| tseliot | bdmurray, this is the missing changelog (the revision after it fixes the failing tests) https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/1:0.9.2 | 15:46 |
| bdmurray | tseliot: I did but it would require a respin of just about every image | 15:46 |
| tseliot | that's too bad | 15:46 |
| jawn-smith | waveform: trying to decide if something is an iso test case failure or not. | 17:24 |
| jawn-smith | When working through the wifi test, I got to the step where I run `netplan apply` and noticed that the included /etc/netplan/10-rpi-ethernet-eth0.yaml is causing errors | 17:25 |
| jawn-smith | Cannot find unique matching interface for eth0: {'driver': 'bcmgenet smsc95xx lan78xx'} | 17:25 |
| jawn-smith | (wifi works fine though) | 17:25 |
| bdmurray | I might have seen that too, did it connect though? | 17:28 |
| jawn-smith | Only after I commented out the contents of that 10-...yaml file | 17:31 |
| jawn-smith | I found LP: #1918421 that seems to be this | 17:32 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1918421 in netplan.io (Ubuntu) "netplan does not match multiple driver specifications" [Undecided, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1918421 | 17:32 |
| Eickmeyer | Not sure if anybody here saw this, but all, if not most, Electron apps are broken due to glibc as identified by seb128. bug 1944468 | 17:34 |
| ubottu | Bug 1944468 in glibc (Ubuntu) "Electron applications all crash upon launch" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1944468 | 17:34 |
| bdmurray | Did you see that the bug was tagged rls-ii-incoming? That means the team responsible for package has been / will be alerted about it. | 17:35 |
| Eickmeyer | bdmurray: I did not see that. I guess that's Foundations that's responsible? | 17:36 |
| bdmurray | yes | 17:36 |
| Eickmeyer | Ok, sounds good. Honestly, I didn't know what that tag did to begin with. | 17:36 |
| * Eickmeyer goes back to regularily scheduled programming | 17:37 | |
| Eickmeyer | (and sorry for the noise) | 17:37 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: so ethernet does not work? | 17:38 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray, ethernet does work | 17:39 |
| jawn-smith | It just wouldn't let me "netplan apply" the wifi changes until I "fixed" the ethernet config | 17:39 |
| jawn-smith | Still working out how the ethernet came up in the first place if that config was broken | 17:40 |
| bdmurray | The bug description leads me to believe waveform was working around this at one point in time | 17:41 |
| jawn-smith | There's an MP linked that supposedly fixes it | 17:42 |
| waveform | yup, just a mo -- there's a fix that bypasses netplan entirely, just digging out where I put that ... | 17:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-opencontainers-specs (impish-proposed/universe) [1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1 => 1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 18:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (impish-proposed/main) [1:21.10.7 => 1:21.10.8] (core) | 18:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-opencontainers-specs [source] (impish-proposed) [1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1ubuntu1] | 18:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-containers-common (impish-proposed/universe) [0.38.16+ds1-1 => 0.38.16+ds1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 18:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-containers-common [source] (impish-proposed) [0.38.16+ds1-1ubuntu1] | 18:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpod (impish-proposed/universe) [3.2.1+ds1-2ubuntu2 => 3.2.1+ds1-2ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 18:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpod [source] (impish-proposed) [3.2.1+ds1-2ubuntu3] | 18:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (hirsute-proposed) [21.3-1-g6803368d-0ubuntu1~21.04.3] | 19:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [21.3-1-g6803368d-0ubuntu1~20.04.3] | 19:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [21.3-1-g6803368d-0ubuntu1~18.04.3] | 19:16 | |
| Eickmeyer | ubuntu-release: Ubuntu Studio is running into a critical bug with the live session. I should have an upload before EOD, but we'll be needing a respin. | 19:22 |
| bdmurray | Eickmeyer: What makes it critical for the Beta image? | 19:23 |
| Eickmeyer | bdmurray: It's an utter failure of an audio system component. | 19:24 |
| bdmurray | rebuilding Ubuntu Desktop amd64, Ubuntu Desktop arm64+rapsi and ubuntukylin | 19:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 20:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bpython (impish-proposed/universe) [0.21-3 => 0.21-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bpython [source] (impish-proposed) [0.21-3ubuntu1] | 20:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922) | 20:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922.1) | 20:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firefox (impish-proposed/main) [92.0+build3-0ubuntu2 => 92.0.1+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) | 20:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc95-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 1.0.1-0ubuntu2~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.0~rc95-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 1.0.1-0ubuntu2~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected youtube-dl [source] (focal-backports) [2020.06.16.1-1~ubuntu20.04.1] | 21:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.0.0~rc95-0ubuntu1~21.04.2 => 1.0.1-0ubuntu2~21.04.1] (ubuntu-server) | 21:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 1.5.5-0ubuntu2~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: studio-controls (impish-proposed/universe) [2.2.2-0ubuntu1 => 2.2.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio) | 21:20 | |
| Eickmeyer | bdmurray: Any chance I can get an ack for ^? That's the fix for the issue I was talking about. | 21:21 |
| Eickmeyer | Once that's through I can go ahead and trigger a rebuild. | 21:22 |
| Eickmeyer | (respin) | 21:23 |
| bdmurray | so convert-studio-controls is going to run at every session start? | 21:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (focal-proposed/main) [1.5.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 1.5.5-0ubuntu2~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:26 | |
| Eickmeyer | bdmurray: Yes, but it's a no-op if the version numbers match. | 21:26 |
| Eickmeyer | It simply converts the user's .config/autojack/autojack.json if it's outdated. | 21:27 |
| Eickmeyer | And creates the initial autojack.json if one doesn't exist. | 21:28 |
| bdmurray | Okay, I was just wondering if it'd slow things down / waste resources | 21:28 |
| Eickmeyer | Nope. | 21:28 |
| bdmurray | I'd think it would because you are running another command only to exit but I've accepted it | 21:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted studio-controls [source] (impish-proposed) [2.2.3-0ubuntu1] | 21:29 | |
| Eickmeyer | It's a reallly low-resource application by design. | 21:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.2-0ubuntu1~21.04.2 => 1.5.5-0ubuntu2~21.04.1] (ubuntu-server) | 21:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: golang-github-ishidawataru-sctp (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.0+git20190723.7c296d4-3~ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 21:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (bionic-proposed/universe) [20.10.7-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 20.10.7-0ubuntu4~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (focal-proposed/universe) [20.10.7-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 20.10.7-0ubuntu4~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.7-0ubuntu1~21.04.1 => 20.10.7-0ubuntu4~21.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:51 | |
| mwhudson | who knows about tzdata? | 23:02 |
| sarnold | :( | 23:04 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: bdmurray does | 23:12 |
| vorlon | also I do | 23:12 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: there seems to be some drama in tzdb land? | 23:13 |
| vorlon | I haven't heard, but I also don't pay close attention | 23:13 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: i'll forward an email i got to foundations-crew, maybe you can take a look / point at someone better when you've finished cabaling | 23:14 |
| vorlon | k | 23:14 |
| dbungert | I'm still confused on bad vs reset test. So on the snapd tests, which are flaky, I expect that a future upload of the deb would resolve this, or also a newer version of the snapd snap to the stable channel would also resolve this. I belive that this should be a bad test, not reset, due to the flakiness. Is that right? If they pass randomly, a later failure on this version isn't a | 23:14 |
| dbungert | regression. | 23:14 |
| mwhudson | dbungert: i think the difference is that a reset test will cause a failure to be ignored for any new version until a pass is recorded and a bad test only ignores a failure in that specific version | 23:15 |
| mwhudson | sarnold: yes | 23:16 |
| dbungert | ok, so I think bad test is desired here, as I would like to see the next deb upload implement the 'pull from beta channel' thing | 23:17 |
| mwhudson | agreed | 23:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922.1) | 23:36 | |
| vorlon | dbungert, mwhudson: also I tend to favor badtest for flaky tests for the simple reason that the next time the test un-flakes, without there being a new upload, it's then considered a successful test again | 23:52 |
| dbungert | actually, I think this hint needs more nuance. I want to hint to let squashfs-tools and the kernels thru, but we shouldn't let systemd ubuntu7 thru. | 23:52 |
| vorlon | in that case you want to force-skiptest on the packages that should be allowed through | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!