/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/09/04/#ubuntu.txt

blahdeblahWeird - I wonder what else broke the extensions then?  I have reinstalled and they're working, but I'd really like to understand what happened.00:00
Guest4hi all02:03
Guest4https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aQ618etpuxdPCjiP3rZftWCVwx-BMBd7/view?usp=sharing02:03
Guest4I was creating the USB stick to install the latest version of Ubuntu but it gives me this error, I also tried to download the file again but it always gives me this error when I do the first step of selecting files in Balena etcher02:05
sarnoldthat kinda looks like a windows dialog box? you might want to ask in #windows02:09
Guest4yes i'm by windows because now ubuntu is not installed02:11
leftyfbGuest4: you're asking for help with a Windows application installed on Windows. Please ask for help with it in #windows02:12
passnullcodehi02:12
=== TechBeardNC_ is now known as TechBeardNC
=== jipang_menjerit is now known as jipangmenjerit
=== jipang_menjerit is now known as jipangmenjerit
=== TWPEagle8164 is now known as TWPEagle816
Guest4hi all07:21
Guest4i'm trying to create usb pendrive to install ubuntu 22.04.107:21
=== GenericPlayer1 is now known as GenericPlayer
=== arif-ali_ is now known as arif-ali
=== nickware9 is now known as nickware
=== SirScott3 is now known as SirScott
=== jimmyb3 is now known as jimmyb
=== ice9_ is now known as ice9
=== DangerM_ is now known as DangerM
=== keypushe- is now known as keypusher
Guest4SPLIT07:23
=== powersurge3600 is now known as powersurge360
Guest4i'm trying to create usb pendrive to install ubuntu 24.04.107:24
Guest4in the application to create this usb pen drive which file system should I select to create?07:24
Guest4Large FAT32 which is already selected as default or should I put NTFS?07:24
toddcGuest4: what os are you using to ceate it07:29
LuckyManand what app07:30
toddcGuest4: official install guide at https://ubuntu.com/tutorials/install-ubuntu-desktop#1-overview07:30
Guest4rufus07:31
Guest4toddc07:31
LuckyManuse Ventoy instead, it's simpler07:31
LuckyManyou just need to copy the .iso07:31
sixwheeledbeastfollow the guide. or if you want multipe isos ventoy is a good option07:31
Guest4toddc i was using balena but it gave me a common error07:32
LuckyManventoy is the best07:32
Guest4https://github.com/balena-io/etcher/issues/415007:33
-ubottu:#ubuntu- Issue 4150 in balena-io/etcher "Error: (0 , h.requestMetadata) is not a function" [Open]07:33
Guest4toddc i have read the guide but it doesn't tell what file system to choose07:33
Guest4sixwheeledbeast i don't know what means multiple isos, i'm just creating the usb pendrive to install ubuntu 24.04.107:35
sixwheeledbeastsay if you wanted more than one version of ubuntu on the same device as a live-usb07:35
Guest4no, just one version, the latest07:36
toddcfast 32 if you already had ubuntu the built in startup disk creator will select the format  that is why i asked  now at this point eith dd or a older version etcher07:36
Guest424.04.1 LTS07:36
=== tomreyn_ is now known as tomreyn
sixwheeledbeastthe guide does cover rufus and balena-etcher.07:37
sixwheeledbeastfat is fine.07:37
Guest4toddc now i'm not using balena etcher because previously it gave me that error about metadata, now i'm using rufus07:37
Guest4sixwheeledbeast do i have to choose Large FAT32?07:38
sixwheeledbeastI've never used balena-etcher, I don't see why not?07:39
Guest4sixwheeledbeast now i'm using rufus and NOT balena. I don't know why not, i just don't know which do i have to select07:40
Guest4just 2 options: Large FAT32 and NTFS07:40
sixwheeledbeastok so continue with FAT3207:40
Guest4Large FAT 32 (default) or NTFS07:40
sixwheeledbeastuse the default yes07:41
Guest4OK THANKS07:41
toddclarge fat32 I assume a large usb 32g+ but it may treat all sizes the same  A while back their were issues with rufus but as a ubuntu/linux user ??  dd or startup disk creator are my main tools07:49
sixwheeledbeastI most recently use ventoy, but I don't want to complicate things. the guide on ubuntu walks you through how to do it on either Win/Mac/buntu. I do feel helping with making a buntu iso is on topic, even if it is being done on Win with Win tools.08:30
NDPMacBookI've used both Rufus (on Windows) and BalenciaEtcher (on macOS) they both work fine.08:42
=== DarkTric- is now known as DarkTrick1
renardHi! Got a Snap-related question. I've got an application (Mattermost Desktop), and I'm using Gitlab to auth and login to it. This means that when launching Mattermost, you get a http button opening your browser (Firefox) with a login page, you log into Gitlab, and then you're normally kicked back to the Mattermost client (with some token?) and proceed09:38
renardWith Mattermost Desktop *and* Firefox being both snaps, the second part just doesn't happen. You login to Gitlab, then Firefox waits forever, and Mattermost waits forever too, not receiving the auth validation09:39
ravagehttps://github.com/snapcrafters/mattermost-desktop/issues/10209:40
-ubottu:#ubuntu- Issue 102 in snapcrafters/mattermost-desktop "[Bug]: new version does not login correctly with SSO" [Open]09:40
renardI guess I'd need to configure *some* snap interface/plug somehow, but I have no idea how that's supposed to workโ€ฆ I don't see just a "http" kind of plug on Mattermost Desktop for instance09:40
renardOh thanks!09:40
=== five61848033918 is now known as five6184803391
Aliekezihi, I have nore more wifi since I updated from 22.04 to 24.04-1 (nothing related appear in the network-manager icons or menus).  from the output of lshw it seems the card isn't used. lspci shows my card with iwlwifi supposed to be used. My card is Wi-Fi 6 AX201 from intel09:48
Aliekeziit see a lot of linux-modules-iwlwifi-xxx packages but none is installed. I also see "backport-iwlwifi-dkms" not installed09:50
vltAliekezi: I would propably try first if wifi works from a 24.04 live iso and, if yes, look what module is used.09:53
* russell-- looking for a clue stick10:26
russell--i have a macbook 12 (2015, aka macbook8,1 i gueess). in the ubuntu 24.04 liveboot/installer the integrated keyboard and trackpad work. i run the installation and reboot into the installed system, suddenly the keyboard and trackpad don't work and i get a bunch of dmesg's along the lines of "applespi spi-APP000D:00: Error reading from device: -110"10:28
JanCI don't have any experience with that hardware, but did you try searching for that error on the web?10:30
russell--JanC: yes10:33
russell--okay, weird. now it's working inexplicably. evidently, more data is needed10:51
ice9this package file-roller has been deferred for phasing since almost a month till now11:05
=== SJrX- is now known as SJrX
russell--seems like about half the time i cold or warm boot, no keyboard / touchpad11:36
russell--seems streaky11:37
russell--doesn't seem deterministic, tried with docking port plugged and unplugged, power plugged and unplugged.11:37
=== vlm__ is now known as vlm
BluesKajHi all12:15
Guest4where is the button on ventoy to add .ISO file i have downloaded?13:04
Guest4it doesn't appear in the app13:04
lotuspsychj3Guest4: ventoy is not an officialy supported ubuntu program13:04
Guest4some people today talked about it to create the usb stick13:05
lotuspsychj3Guest4: yeah, agree its a pretty decent app, but the volunteers here cant support it officialy13:06
ravageAlso you don't need an App to add ISOs to ventoy13:06
lotuspsychj3there are several tutorials online Guest413:07
ravageYou just copy it to the correct location13:07
Guest4https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w1sRl5cXJEXWIevHL78-dQTeE-s0zsBP/view?usp=sharing13:09
Guest4lotuspsychj3 ravage13:09
ravageRefer to their documentation for the initial setup13:10
Guest4ravage do i need first to put ventoy on usb pen?13:10
ravageYes13:10
Guest4it's difficult to have free my pen at now13:11
Guest4it still give me error of write protection, i don't know how to make it free from this error and use it again as before13:12
lotuspsychj3!usb | Guest4 see also13:14
ubottuGuest4 see also: For information about installing Ubuntu from USB flash drives, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/FromUSBStick - For a persistent live USB install, see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LiveUsbPendrivePersistent13:14
eelstreborwhy would a package be downgraded? this is the second time in 2 months that firefox has been downgraded13:19
ravageUbuntu delivers firefox  as a snap13:21
ravageand that does not downgrade13:21
ravageif you use any any 3rd party repo to get firefox please ask their support13:21
eelstreborthe snap version didn't work right so i added the mozilla repository and got firefox from there13:27
ravageso please ask them about their repo13:28
tzI struggle to configure letterboxing with xrandr. My problem is, that windows are drawn into the letterboxes seemingly at random. And I want them to stay black.13:29
supesdupesHi. What other options does one have for a more customized install experience for ubuntu desktop? Red hat/fedora has a netinstall + kickstart. Debian has the ISO builder application and netinstaller also. But what does ubuntu have as an option?13:29
ravage supesdupes autoinstall13:29
ravagehttps://canonical-subiquity.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/intro-to-autoinstall.html13:30
supesdupesIsn't that deprecated?13:30
mgedminno, it's the latest newest thing13:30
mgedminyou may be thinking about the old netinstall .iso images13:31
ravagesome say too new. but thats a topic for the discussion channel13:31
supesdupesThis autoinstall, lets you decide to exclude or include packages as your decision?13:33
mgedmininclude: yes; exclude: not really, but you can run `apt-get remove ...` in late-commands13:36
mgedminafaiu the way ubuntu installation works is that the installer copies the files from the live system image, instead of dealing with packages13:37
ravageyou could start with the server iso and upgrade to a desktop. but then you lose a lot of the desktop specific things the desktop autoinstall could do for you13:38
ravageand the minimal desktop setting really only comes with the basic13:38
ravageminimal as in the new default13:38
sevenstar6http://peacemakergame.com revelation 20 gog and magog...13:45
sevenstar6awaymsg13:48
sevenstar6how ?13:48
supesdupesWould it be fair to say that snaps were designed with enterprise in mind compared to flatpak, which seems to be more tailored to the average joe?13:54
ravagesnap started on a mobile platform. then went to IOT and now also supports desktop13:55
ravageand because you could call Ubuntu the "average Joe" Linux so is snap now probably ๐Ÿ™‚13:56
speederHello! Is there a premade variation of Ubuntu that uses Xorg instead of Wayland?14:36
ravageyes. Ubuntu14:38
=== tortilla is now known as tortillasandwich
speederUbuntu doesn't use Wayland by default?14:38
ravagelogout. click your username. click the gear icon. select Xorg14:38
speederah.14:38
speederDoes this work on Kubuntu too? (I am on Arch right now but my boss asked me to install whatever is installed in our EC2... and what is installed there is Ubuntu Lunar with Xorg)14:39
tomreynspeeder: if you need something which, dy default, boots into xorg on the live system: i think xfwm/xfce does not work on wayland, yet, so Xubuntu should default to xorg.14:39
tomreynwhat is "Ubuntu Lunar"?14:40
speederLunar Lobster14:40
tomreyn!lunar14:40
ubottuUbuntu 23.04 (Lunar Lobster) was the 38th release of Ubuntu, support ended on January 25, 2024. See !eol and https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2023-December/000297.html14:40
ravageeh. please use 24.0414:40
speedertell that to Amazon. Lastest release they officially support is Lunar Lobster. I dunno why.14:40
ravagei am not sure about Kubuntu actually. but just boot the Live USB14:40
tomreynonly even years (so far) are LTS releases14:41
ravageKubuntu uses another login manager. but im sure you can switch it too14:41
ravagebut just test it. and please dont install an unsupported release14:42
lotuspsychj3kubuntu is also working on making wayland support better14:42
ravageyou can also ask in #kubuntu14:42
tomreynspeeder: aws marketplace lists ubuntu 24.0414:42
tomreynhttps://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-s4zvkzmlirbga14:43
speedergreat :D this mean we can update, after I fix our bug (the software I am maintaining for some reason doesn't work with recent nVidia drivers)14:43
ravagekeep in mind Kubuntu support is not during the whole LTS support span14:44
ravagecorrect me if im wrong. but its 3 years?14:44
tomreynso far, i think so, but it's better to check release notes14:44
tomreynfor LTS releases, that is14:45
speederI guess I will stick with Ubuntu and install whatever window manager I prefer.14:46
tomreynthat'll bring you into the same situation14:46
speederas for supported Ubuntu on Amazon, I got info from here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/systems-manager/latest/userguide/operating-systems-and-machine-types.html14:47
tomreynthat's AWS documentation for the "Systems Manager" product. AWS documentation may occasionally lag behind when it comes to references to third party software / AMIs14:48
tomreynin this case, it discusses which OSes and OS versions are supported by AWS "Systems Manager". That's a different topic than whether newer Ubuntu releases, in general, are available and supported on AWS.14:49
Square2When is the 22.04 -> 24.04 ugprade made available through "Software updates"?14:50
tomreyn"Ubuntu Server" does not include a GUI (which Ubuntu Desktop and flavours do - some of whose packages may have different support lifecycles)14:50
Square2maybe it's called automatic upgrade?14:51
tomreynspeeder: ^ this was to you14:51
Square2oh, it's out i see now14:52
speederI think we use Ubuntu Server with Xorg installed.14:53
tomreynSquare2: when     curl -s https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-lts | grep -o 'Dist: noble'    creates output14:53
Square2oh, so not out yey14:54
Square2yet14:54
Square2But but https://9to5linux.com/you-can-now-upgrade-ubuntu-22-04-lts-to-ubuntu-24-04-lts-heres-how ?14:54
tomreynspeeder: xorg is probably supported for 5 years as part of Ubuntu Desktop, but other packages you have installed for the graphical UI are probably not supported for 5 years.14:54
happymealmate is the way :D14:54
speederMakes sense.14:55
speederWell, we are using EOLed Ubuntu anyway :/14:55
tomreynhappymeal: i'm afraid this would not provide 5 years of support either14:56
tomreynspeeder: looks like it - try changing it, and consider getting "pro".14:56
happymealyeah sorry i wasnt paying attention closely, just chiming in with my favorite UI :D14:57
speederOh I see. We ARE using Systems Manager, and indeed it doesn't support new Ubuntu.14:58
speeder(or Pro, it seems)14:58
tomreyn"Ubuntu Pro" is an add-on to (amongst other) the AWS AMIs, I don't think it gets in the way of AWS SSM.15:00
ravageand pro is also more suited for you server. especially if you want to use Kubuntu on your desktop15:01
ravagethat still has the 3 year limit even with Pro15:01
tomreynwell, pro has that best effort security support for universe15:02
ravageyou may get updates. sure15:02
ravagei dont use Kubuntu so i dont know if there are updates our for like kubuntu 18.04 ๐Ÿ™‚15:03
ravage*out15:03
tomreynhttps://ubuntu.com/security/esm suggests that full "Pro" (without the "infra-only" tag) gets 10 years of (not just best effort) support for 23000 packages in universe15:06
ravageyep. but that always require someone to look for security problems in that outdated versions15:07
ravageand nobody else uses these older packages anymore i think15:07
tomreyni assume there are only 23K packages in universe (have not checked) and that Canonical claims to provide security support for all of them.15:08
tomreynspeeder: https://ubuntu.com/aws/pro may be relevant to you15:08
ravageyes they do. but i dont think they hired enough people to check the source codes15:09
ravagethere needs to be a CVE15:09
tomreynoh, got you now15:09
=== PasiZ1 is now known as PasiZ
JanCa CVE or a bug report, I suppose15:10
Square2Do you prefer to upgrade or make a fresh install whenever a new LTS is released?15:10
ravagedepend15:10
ravages15:10
ravagedid both. both worked15:11
ravageif i feel my system is cluttered anyway i wipe and reinstall15:11
tomreynJanC: just security support, i think, so it'd take a CVE, most likely, maybe a launchpad bug with a public/private security tag would also work.15:11
tomreynSquare2: regarding the 9to5linux.com article - i assume that LTS upgrades to 24.04 were supported at some point and have since been disabled due to a serious bug.15:13
ravageyes it was enabled15:13
Square2oh ok15:13
ravagedid not know it was stopped. but my mastodon hinted that this may have been a good idea15:13
Square2what was the bug?15:13
ravageinstaller crashing i think15:14
ravagewe had some of those here too in the last days15:14
tomreynSquare2: you can always override this by passing the -d (development) option to do-release-upgrade - at your own risk. i recommend at least reading the known bugs section of the release notes before trying this. and having complete and reliable backups, of course.15:14
ravagebut i think most of them had some 3rd party repos enabled15:14
tomreynhttps://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-lts was last updated yesterday.15:17
Square2tomreyn, I'll wait for the official release. Just curious.15:18
tomreynso just run a daily cronjob: curl -s https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-lts | grep -o 'Dist: noble' >/dev/null && echo '"Noble" LTS upgrade is available!'15:20
Square 15:34
manwhowouldbekinHi all. I am on Ubuntu 24.04. Every now and then, my PC suddenly reboots. I have done some hardware tests to no avail. I would like to see if there is a journal or log on OS side in which I could look for possible causes.16:53
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: feel free to share your dmesg in a !paste please, so the volunteers can take a look for you16:55
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, any particular command?16:56
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: sudo dmesg , please16:56
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, https://pastebin.com/CCEyNbHK16:58
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: why are you on kernel 5.18 please?16:59
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, Not sure. Awhile ago I experimented with kernel compilation. Since then, I have not followed the updates. Should it be newer at this point?17:00
lotuspsychj3!info linux-image-generic noble17:00
ubottulinux-image-generic (6.8.0-41.41, noble): Generic Linux kernel image. In component main, is optional. Built by linux-meta. Size 11 kB / 17 kB. (Only available for amd64, armhf, arm64, ppc64el, s390x.)17:00
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: ^should be your current 24.04 kernel version17:00
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: reboot into 6.8 and see if you still get your reboot issues17:01
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, So, just to be clear, in my boot menu I have several kernels, among which 5.18 is the highest 5.xx version. Above those there is "Ubuntu" option to select. Is that the one you suggest?17:02
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: check your kernel list with; dpkg --list | grep linux-image17:04
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, https://pastebin.com/c2dGu29k17:05
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: i think something went pretty wrong there17:05
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: lsb_release -a17:06
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, https://pastebin.com/LiCc9K4817:07
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: try sudo apt install linux-image-generic17:08
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, Appears to have run successfully. Should I reboot and see if it appears on the list?17:10
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: did it pull kernel 6.8?17:10
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, Yes. It said that in the terminal17:10
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: ok reboot please17:10
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, brb17:11
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, I am back, booted into 6.8 Something is way off with my graphics. The resolution looks very distorted and there is a green hue everywhere on the wallpaper. I also cannot access the settings to change that for some reason.17:18
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: sudo dmesg , again please17:18
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, When I click to open the terminal, it is located on the screen such that I cannot see it due to distortion. Any way to go about that?17:20
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: my guess would be your nvidia driver maybe not properly installed17:20
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: try logout and switch to xorg instead of wayland ( if thats not the case already)17:21
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, Not sure I understand fully. Do logout and then?17:21
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: when logged out, you can choose ubuntu(wayland) or ubuntu(xorg)17:22
lotuspsychj3see wich one you are on17:22
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, I shall try now, but I don't think I have ever seen those terms on mine.17:23
manwhowouldbekinIs there a key combo to logout? I cannot access any normal buttons.17:23
BardonHello, if I want to uninstall a package from GUI, where should I go? App center only lists snap packages17:24
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: ctrl alt del17:26
z4Xhello ppl someone can help me setup mailx to send email login ssh ?17:27
twelvnighnhell17:29
twelvnighno17:29
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, On my login screen there is nothing that contains either Wayland or Xorg. Mine has a tile with my username, topbar with some clickable buttons in the right corner and a date button in the middle. Towards the buttom there is an Ubuntu logo with an Orange circle.17:29
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: https://files.workcomposer.com/file/cms/1660045490210.jpg17:31
twelvnighnwot17:31
nightnotdarki kinda installed the flatpak on xubuntu and tried installing roblox from it, well it doesnt launch at all, how do i remove roblox ?17:32
lotuspsychj3manwhowouldbekin: once on xorg, you can go check additional drivers in software&updates and see if nvidia driver is installed17:32
nightnotdarkhelp, any1?17:33
nightnotdarklotuspsychj3?17:35
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, Mine does not have that. It looks quite different. I'll get you a picture shortly17:36
nightnotdarkI kinda installed the flatpak on xubuntu and tried installing roblox from it, well it doesnt launch at all, how do i remove roblox ?17:36
nightnotdarkhello??17:37
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, https://pasteboard.co/926GdD5jtaGa.jpg17:38
toddcnightnotdark: flatpacks are not offially supported here so most user have not used or have a idea17:39
toddcnightnotdark: you are welcome to hangout and some may have a answer when they read it17:40
nightnotdarkokay17:41
nightnotdarki did try sudo remove command but when i go to the disk usage analyzer, it shows theres a file of flatpaks17:41
nightnotdarki cant delete it, i dont have permission it says17:42
nightnotdarkhow do i bypass that17:42
nightnotdarkmilitantorc hey17:42
manwhowouldbekin@nightnotdark, do flatpak list to see if it is installed via flatpak17:42
nightnotdarkok lemme see17:42
nightnotdarkhttps://bpa.st/VLEYQ17:43
nightnotdarkyeh look17:43
manwhowouldbekin@nightnotdark, I don't know what Roblox is, so it appears to me from your list that it was not installed via flatpak?17:46
nightnotdarkso, what do i do17:51
nightnotdarkok so, dont care abt roblox, but what abt those things which were isntall via flatpak17:53
nightnotdarkhow i remove them17:53
nightnotdarkmanwhowouldbekin17:53
militantorcdo flatpak --help17:53
nightnotdarkcuz i went to the flatpak folder and tried deleting it17:53
nightnotdarkflatpak --help ok17:53
militantorcdon't touch those files17:53
militantorcnever touch files made by a package manager17:54
militantorconly manipualte them through the interface of the package manager17:54
nightnotdarkoh17:54
nightnotdarkso, what do i do17:54
militantorcflatpak --help should list all the important commands and options of flatpak17:54
militantorcflatpak list to list the flatpaks17:54
militantorcflatpak unisntall name to uninstall one etc17:54
nightnotdarkalso the roblox was installed by "vinegar" smth17:55
militantorcJust use normal wine17:55
militantorcor play on linux oir whatever you like17:56
militantorcoh17:56
militantorclooks like vinegar is some launcher17:56
militantorcnot wine related17:56
militantorcsorry17:56
militantorchttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3568160717:57
militantorcRoblox doesn't want to support linux, they deliberately hate linux apparently17:57
militantorcNot just letting live without support but intentionally blocking it17:58
nightnotdarkoh ic17:59
nightnotdarkwell okay then17:59
nightnotdarki removed all items from list17:59
nightnotdarkthanks for help17:59
nightnotdarkbye17:59
militantorcUsually windows software which just didn't care to support linux isn't too bad and can be made to work, often as is. Its the crap that deliberately tries to block other oses, comes with malware in built etc thats tough to work with18:02
ElliriaHey there, is there a way to find out who's in charge of the ubuntu-users mailing list and to write to them privately? There seems to be a troll who's successfully getting generous, kind people to spend time in responding to him.18:08
BardonHello, if I want to uninstall a package from GUI, where should I go? App center only lists snap packages18:13
ElliriaI think you'd want Synaptic for that.18:18
manwhowouldbekin@lotuspsychj3, in case you are back, this is what my login screen looks like, as per discussion above https://pasteboard.co/926GdD5jtaGa.jpg18:18
JanCElliria: all mailing lists have a page like this: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users18:31
JanCsee at the bottom of that page18:31
JanCbasically just add -owner to the list name, so mail to ubuntu-users-owner@18:36
ElliriaAh, thank you. I totally missed the "list run by" part at the bottom. Thanks!18:37
JanCthere are other mail addresses listed there, but -owner should get to all of them18:38
ElliriaAs long as I get somebody, I'm good. If it's the wrong somebody, they'll let me know.18:46
JanCthe reason to use -owner is that some people might not be available all the time  :)18:48
ElliriaAh, okay.18:53
=== unixeng668313 is now known as unixeng66831
Furai_Wast 24.04.1 pulled?19:20
Furai_I don't see it anymore in do-release-upgrade or motd.19:22
=== unixeng668313 is now known as unixeng66831
Furai_https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-lts19:34
Furai_Ok it's missing here for whatever reason.19:34
Furai_So it's not reported as LTS.19:34
PeGaSuSQ: SSD died? https://filehost.0bin.xyz/ny4OeAfVUiSs.jpg19:37
tomreynFurai: it appears that the LTS upgrade path to 24.04 has been disabled recently, possibly yesterday.19:41
tomreynFurai_: ^19:41
tomreynPeGaSuS: it could also be a broken file system. its (short) UUID suggests it is a (non-journalling) vfat or (not fully supported in terms of management utilities) ntfs file system.19:43
michaelpHi, is anyone able to fix https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-lts so that it includes the Noble 24.04.1 release? This is preventing people from upgrading using the do-release-upgrade script.19:44
tomreynPeGaSuS: you should refer to the systemd journal or syslog for details, which may include media errors. alternatively, use smartctl to inspect the disk's status.19:44
tomreynmichaelp: i believe that the fact that the LTS release upgrade path to 24.04 is not currently available is intentional, probably while grave bugs are being fixed.19:45
tomreynthe "known bugs/issues"  section of the 24.04 LTS release notes *may* have more information on this.19:46
tomreyn!notes19:46
ubottuUbuntu 24.04 (Noble Numbat) release notes can be found at https://ubottu.com/y/noble19:46
michaelpInteresting, so the upgrade path was released yesterday and then pulled. I wonder what the reason was.19:48
PeGaSuStomreyn: the thing is that it was working perfectly, until I rebooted it (should have rebooted a few days ago). I can access the recovery but now I don't know what to do19:48
tomreynPeGaSuS: i just suggested how to proceed19:49
tomreynmichaelp: i did not suggest that the upgrade path was enabled yesterday.19:49
tomreyn(I believe it was enabled earlier than that.)19:50
ioriamichaelp, apt-cache policy update-manager-core19:51
michaelpI know, but people on AskUbuntu, the Ubuntu Forums, and Reddit are all reporting the upgrade broken around 15:01 when the release manifest was modified. It would just be nice to have communication from Canonical when the "Release an upgrade" and then pull it less than a week later.19:52
tomreynmichaelp: another regular here, who supports (maybe also manages) many installations, previously reported that they had the release upgrader crashing on systems with "foreign" (3rd party) packages.19:52
tomreynhave you checked their communication channels on it, though?19:53
PeGaSuSI need to create a USB stick with Ubuntu (don't have one). bbl19:53
ioriamichaelp, update-manager-core is probably phased , so you would need to force it19:54
michaelpApt-cache shows the latest version phased at 0% on version 1:22.04.20. Maybe it means they're still holding things back. I just upgraded it with bypassing the phased update. But the issue doesn't have to do with the upgrade script, the release is literally missing from the changelogs. If people are still reporting the script to crash, then maybe19:56
michaelpCanonical should post something on a mailing list, or heck, *anywhere* instead of silently modifying a file on an esoteric server19:56
tomreynioria: the release upgrader consults https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-lts to check whether the upgrade path is supported, and noble is not currently listed there, meaning also the newest release upgrader would not support upgrading at this time - in my understanding.19:56
ioriamichaelp, tomreyn https://askubuntu.com/questions/1525477/unable-to-upgrade-from-ubuntu-server-22-04-to-24-04-119:57
michaelpYes I posted my findings on that Q19:57
ioriatomreyn, yes, maybe so19:58
tomreynioria: is there a specific part of this long page i should be reading?19:58
ioriatomreyn, nope19:58
tomreyn:) ok20:02
ioriamichaelp, can you check if you have a '/home/$USER/.cache/update-manager-core/meta-release-lts' file ?20:02
BardonElliria: Sorry for the delay. Synaptic seems to work, but I'm surprised there no easier option for someone that is new to Ubuntu20:31
BardonI installed Ubuntu to someone that isn't familiar with Linux distributions, and they asked me how to remove a software. There must be an easy way to do so with a GUI right?20:32
ElliriaSorry about that. I use Kubuntu instead of Ubuntu, so I was of even less use than I normally could be. I'm glad it worked for you, though, and you can always come in here.20:32
tomreynBardon: i *do* think that a clean install would let you manage both snaps and debs from the graphical software "store" application20:32
ElliriaYou can remove software with Synaptic as well.20:33
ElliriaYou mark it for deletion and then apply.20:33
tomreynBardon: i think it's a terrible user experience but it should be technically possible20:33
Bardontomreyn: the store app has a "manage" tab on the left, from which I see 5 apps20:34
BardonMy friend told me: what if I want to remove libreoffice?20:34
BardonAnd it isn't there in the stop app20:34
BardonI see only snaps20:34
leftyfbBardon: https://imgur.com/a/YzkVBLz20:36
tomreynthis could be a result of removing a package which enables managing .deb's on this software store app.20:36
leftyfbthe "Ubuntu Software" application20:36
tomreynwhich ubuntu releases is everyone reeferring to?20:37
ElliriaI'm seeing a bunch of files when I do a search for libreoffice in my software. You could do a search in Synaptic for it. I'm not sure what it would do to the system to get rid of them, though.20:37
leftyfbtomreyn: in my case, 22.0420:37
BardonI am talking about 24.04.1 LTS20:37
leftyfbit should be the same20:37
ElliriaI use Kubuntu 22.04 LTS.20:37
leftyfbBardon: open the "Ubunut Software" application20:37
leftyfbwho is asking to remove LibreOffice?20:37
Bardonleftyfb: A friend, just as an example, in case they wanted to remove an app20:38
leftyfbBardon: are you running Ubuntu right now?20:38
Bardonleftyfb: This is what I see in the Ubuntu Software app https://imgur.com/a/APkK4Nw20:39
Bardonleftyfb: Yes20:39
BardonSorry it's not in english20:40
ElliriaCan you type libreoffice into the box at the top to search for it?20:40
BardonElliria: Hmm, I don't have it installed in my laptop. It was only installed in my friend's20:42
BardonI tried with vim20:42
Bardonand it offers to remove it :)20:42
ElliriaI probably wouldn't dare. Heh.20:43
Bardonleftyfb: How did you get that nice list of installed packages?20:43
leftyfb24.04 might have changed the layout20:43
leftyfbI'm running 22.0420:43
BardonIs it the app "snap-store" (if you launch it from terminal)?20:44
leftyfbyes20:44
BardonOk it changed then20:45
Bardon(icon is an A on an orange bag right?)20:45
BardonRight, it says "App center version 1.0.0", must be something new20:46
BardonThat app has some interesting feature requests like https://github.com/ubuntu/app-center/issues/170420:51
-ubottu:#ubuntu- Issue 1704 in ubuntu/app-center "Uninstalling a Debian package does not remove unused dependencies" [Open]20:51
Square2Has there been any date posted on 24.04.1 LTS release?20:52
leftyfbSquare2: a week ago20:53
tomreynBardon: this does suggest that it's possible to uninstall .deb's from it, though?20:54
Bardontomreyn: It is, but the only way I found is to manually search it in the search bar20:54
Square2leftyfb, I mean for when it will appear here https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-lts20:54
BardonI was hopping to get a nice list like in your screenshot20:55
tomreynBardon: if you click on Manage on the left pane you can both search installed applications and scroll down on the list20:55
tomreynBardon: just to correct this, the screenshot was leftyfb's20:55
tomreyn*credit20:56
tomreynBardon: indeed this list of installed applications is very short, though, and it seems to be all snaps.20:56
tomreynso another bug, i guess20:56
Bardontomreyn: Ah right sorry20:57
tomreynBardon: so you have a longer list including apt / dpkg managed software there?20:58
tomreyni'm just testing on a live system at https://distrosea.com/, which will behave differently than a proper installation20:59
PeGaSuSsorry. got caught with real life. bringing back my issue: my machine was working perfectly before the reboot. after the reboot, I got this: https://filehost.0bin.xyz/ny4OeAfVUiSs.jpg21:00
PeGaSuSI'm currently on a live usb. how should I proceed?21:00
tomreynPeGaSuS: i previously suggested approaches on how to proceed. chat logs are available online21:01
tomreyn!logs21:01
ubottuOfficial channel logs can be found at https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ . LoCo channels are now logged there too. Meetingology logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/21:01
tomreynif you need more detail on these approaches, please ask21:02
PeGaSuSI did `fdisk -l` to find the disk and then `fsck /dev/sda2` (where I have the system installed). output of both: https://0bin.xyz/DNDXZPKUHVLQCVAT6HRIMEIGDE21:06
tomreyngenerally, you should not run fsck on a mounted file system, unless it explicitly supports doing so. even then, it's preferrable to run it while the file system is not mounted.21:09
tomreyn(this output seem to suggest that the file system wasnot mounted at the time you run fsck, though)21:09
PeGaSuSit's not mounted, though21:10
tomreynrun fsck with -f if you want to force the check21:10
tomreynnote, however, that doing a file system repair on a file system stored on physically broken media is likely to make things worse21:11
tomreynso i'd recommend checking the disks' health first of all21:12
PeGaSuSthe `fsck -f /dev/sda2` returned: https://0bin.xyz/MCAHKIY7K7MS2CYQ4QBHEHOXSE21:12
tomreynso this file system appears to be sonsistent.21:13
tomreyn*consistent21:13
PeGaSuSoutput of `smartctl -x /dev/sda2` is: https://0bin.xyz/ED46VYJA2PNUCEN5V2MT5DWRVM21:13
tomreynit is unusual for ext4 file systems to have an 8 character UUID, though21:14
tomreynyour first screenshot showed that the file system which failed to mount had an 8-character UUID21:14
tomreynso i'm guessing that you're working on the wrong file system21:15
PeGaSuSI know that the disk is the /dev/sda (the only one with 512Gb, other is 250Gb).21:17
tomreynthe smartctl log for disk sda (sda2 would be a partion) does *not* indicate a physical defective storage media21:17
tomreynhowever, this storage media product is not in the software's (smartmon-tools') database, so it's ability to determine this is limited21:19
tomreynID 5 - Reallocated_Sector_Ct = 0    suggests it is likely fine, though21:20
PeGaSuSright. unfortunately I can't boot into the system. I have two SSD: one with Ubuntu (512Gb) and one with Windows (250Gb). Windows boots and works fine.21:21
tomreynthe "blkid" command should list IDs of known file systems21:21
tomreyn*UUIDs21:21
PeGaSuSoutput of ``blkid``: https://0bin.xyz/TQ7MWVOAHNG77BXISKLYD6BQYI21:22
tomreyndoes it list BAF1-00F2 ?21:22
PeGaSuSyes, it is there (the 1st one)21:22
tomreyndid you run the tests against this file system?21:23
tomreynyour latest pastebin post suggests that UUID BAF1-00F2 is stored on partition sda121:24
PeGaSuSvia `fsck -f /dev/sda1`?21:24
tomreynwith sudo, yes21:24
PeGaSuSI got: /dev/sda1: 24 files, 13593/130811 clusters21:25
tomreynthis is your EFI System Partition, a vfat (DOS-like FAT32-like) file system (without journalling)21:25
tomreynso apparently this file system is fine, too. this suggests that there is a different error which occurred before what we can see on your boot screen21:26
tomreynyou'd need to mount your root file system and access the logs on it to learn what may have caused the boot to fail21:26
PeGaSuScan you provide me the commands please?21:26
tomreynthat's the file system mounted to / when you boot normally21:27
tomreynbased on https://0bin.xyz/DNDXZPKUHVLQCVAT6HRIMEIGDE i'm guessing that either /dev/sda2 (411.2 GiB) or /dev/sda3 (65.2 GiB) is your Ubuntu install's / (root) file system21:28
tomreyndo you happen to know or can you guess which one it is?21:29
PeGaSuSit's /dev/sda2. the sda3 one has Zorin installed in dual-boot (completely forgot about it, sorry)21:30
tomreynis anything mounted to /mnt currently?21:31
tomreynls /mnt21:31
PeGaSuSno output, so I'd say no21:31
tomreynif it's empty, mount sda2 to /mnt now:    sudo mount /dev/sda2 /mnt21:31
tomreynno output = it's empty21:31
PeGaSuSsda2 mounted21:32
tomreynthen look at what is mounted in /mnt now21:32
PeGaSuSbin  boot  cdrom  dev  etc  home  lib  lib32  lib64  libx32  lost+found  media  mnt  opt  proc  root  run  sbin  snap  srv  swapfile  sys  tmp  usr  var21:32
tomreynif it's a linux distro's root file system, you should see subdirectories such as usr, etc, var21:32
tomreynthis looks fine21:33
tomreynrun    sudo journalctl -D /mnt/var/log/journal21:34
tomreyndoes this show a log?21:34
tomreynPeGaSuS: if so, run    sudo journalctl -D /mnt/var/log/journal --list-boots     and identify the boot which gave you the on-screen error messages you posted initially21:35
tomreynidentify it by it's "IDX" column21:36
PeGaSuSyes. it has shown a log21:36
tomreynit's likely to be 0 or -121:36
PeGaSuS-1, yes21:36
tomreynthen run   sudo journalctl -D /mnt/var/log/journal -b -1 -p421:37
tomreynthis will show you any log messages captured during this boot what were at least warnings, or worse21:38
PeGaSuShere it is: https://termbin.com/lypn21:38
tomreyn-p4 means priority 4 (which is == warning)21:38
tomreyn"usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71" indicates issues accessing a usb device. it's unclear at this point whether this is a storage media device21:40
tomreyni'm unfamiliar with "block sda: the capability attribute has been deprecated." - i'm guessing it points to some partition table flag which has been deprecated, and it should just bbe a warning21:41
PeGaSuSI have: USB controller, USB desk lamp and a port extender(?). I can unplug them and see, though21:42
tomreynsome incorrectly configured file system permissions are pointed out, and should be fixed, but this is likely not the cause of the system failing to boot21:42
PeGaSuSoh, and a smartwatch that's charging21:42
tomreyntrying to boot without unneccessary usb devices attached may help the system to boot21:43
PeGaSuSthe weird thing is that I've been booting like this for ages, though. I'll remove all the extra USB devices and try to boot. I'll be bback with feedback in a few21:44
tomreyncan you cat /mnt/etc/fstab   fist?21:45
tomreyn*first21:46
PeGaSuSoops. sorry, already rebooted. and it booted perfectly. removed the USB controller and the USB desk lamp21:49
tomreynenter your bios/uefi setup utility and change the boot order to not boot to usb devices before you boot from internal disks, in case that's currently configured.21:50
tomreynalternatively, don't connect mass storage usb devices ("usb disks"/ usb connected storage media) when booting ubuntu21:51
tomreynrepartitioning or reformatting those usb devices may also solve the issue.21:52
PeGaSuSright. I'll take a look at the boot order. that's probably messed up21:53
PeGaSuSthanks for the patience and help! really appreciated21:54
tomreynyou're welcome21:55
PeGaSuSbtw, I'm getting a new SSD (I've ordered it a few days ago). it is 1Tb. can I just clone the one I have to the 1Tb directly? knowing that the current one is half of the size of the new one?22:05
tomreynPeGaSuS: it *should* work, if you'll remove the other disk before booting, and the new disk is connected to the same bus. otherwise, you may need to adjust efi variables22:20
PeGaSuSI guess that it'll mess up the secure boot?22:23
tomreynpossibly, i have too little experience to tell22:24
PeGaSuSI'll definitely share feedback on that. the disk is supposed to arrive tomorrow but I'm still waiting for my friend to bring me the SATA-to-USB thingy22:25
tomreynPeGaSuS: you could use clonezilla to do the clone: https://clonezilla.org/fine-print-live-doc.php?path=clonezilla-live/doc/03_Disk_to_disk_clone22:35
tomreyni do not know for sure whether they have tested this process with uefi booting systems, though i assume they have.22:36
PeGaSuSaye. I'll bookmark that and take a read. thanks for the link!22:36

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!